Riddle me ths Batman...

BATs on turbocharged and intercooled engines are directly related to initial air temperature. Ambient air is almost always cooler than air taken from the engine compartment. The lower the temp of the air charge going into the air filter at the front of the intake tract, the cooler will the the air charge coming out of the intercooler, even though the turbo may add several hundred degrees to the air charge while compressing the air and the intercooler may take most of that back.

There are well established mathmetical formulas that determine intercooler efficiency. Those formulas begin with temperature at the point of earlierst entry of air into the intake system. Work through the formula and the result is that a change by increase in ambient temperature on the front end of the intake tract results in the same number of degrees in rise of the intake charge after it leaves the intercooler.

Sorry for getting us away from the gas mileage issue. How much this difference in initial intake temperature matters can be insignificant or huge depending on operating conditions, which is beyond the scope of this thread about mileage.

I agree with you 100%, and should because it is mathematical fact. My post didn't go into that great of detail because of the reasons you named in your final paragraph. The overall point of my post is that the change in performance of a CAI over an SRI is negligable next to what a more efficient intercooler can do for you.
 

New Threads and Articles

Back