not your everyday sri discussion
- Thread starter myspd3
- Start date
- Status
mr_mazda329
Member
- :
- 97 Mazda Miata; 09 CWP Mazdaspeed 3
At one time..people were paying $300+ used for a cobb SRI when they were on backorder.
- :
- 2010 Mazda5 GT
Why no poll? I got the CP-e Nano. I liked the looks of it better along with the mount to the battery. Didn't really care foe the COBB Blue as others did. I liked the black silicon and shiny pieces 
To get the COBB in black piping (SU), it would almost equal the price of the CP-e. And plus, I got the Dryflow filter which is easier to maintain at the expense of a few HP?
To get the COBB in black piping (SU), it would almost equal the price of the CP-e. And plus, I got the Dryflow filter which is easier to maintain at the expense of a few HP?You are interested in a SRI but you don't want to know which is better?
no because there has been plenty of threads on that so i really don't need to ask which is better. i just wanted to know which is the more popular one.
but it doesn't matter anymore i bought the COBB SRI
madvillian
Member
- :
- Mazdaspeed3
go with the cpe, the metal maf housing/air straightener is of much better quality, and many may agree that it looks better as well. the cobb WAS more popular at one time, but thats because nothing else was available.
haha too late. idk it was something about the COBB SRI that just made me buy it.
i hope i don't regret it
mr_mazda329
Member
- :
- 97 Mazda Miata; 09 CWP Mazdaspeed 3
I think the Cobb's silicone tube might do a slightly better job at keeping temps a bit lower but that’s trivial, like the CAI vs. SRI argument. I would say they both do just as well in providing a less restrictive intake path vs. the very restrictive stock air box.
- Status
