I have no problem with a rotary engine. I have a problem with this rotary thats only basis of sales is the gimmic that its a rotary when a 4 cylinder turbo would be far better performer.
alot of people who buy the cars is strictly for the reason. we like to be different, out of the norm, unique. It's the automotive equivalent of getting a mowhawk to differentiate ourselves. 85% of Rx-7s owners bought it for respect and love of the rotary. Unless you can appreciate its uniqueness, and benefits (power per liter ratios 50-50 weight distribution <try that with an I-4> and high free smooth revving) then you don't buy one. The guy on top gear voted it "
the best car ever tested in 2003(excluding supercars but mainly means all over for price and all)". and I'll qiuote him again "It doesn't feel like it's running on something as crude as petrol, but rather smooth like double cream. This car is amazing! Now you may ask yourself why a 1.3 liter is on our race track, and it's because it is still a sports car making 236 bhp and and supurb handling abilities." So tell me again the the Rx-8 didn't put Mazda on the performace, map which it wasn't even intended to do. That sounds liek you made it up.
Each rotary expiriment was assigned a goal.
rotary experiment 4 (Rx-4) luxery car
rotary experiment 5 (Rx-5) rotary sedan
rotary experiment 6 (no Rx-6 made, japanese couldn't say "x-6" together properly)
rotary experiment 7 (Rx-7) a rotary powered sports car
rotary experiment 8 (Rx-8) regain popularity and abolish yths of unreliable rotaries by releasing a problem free rotary vehicle offering both perfomrance and day to day driving as a "practicle" sports car.
Get your facts straight, THAT is the reason they made the Rx-8 and THAT is why it has a rotary engine.