jurgs01 said:
That just is the max power it is able to put out. There is an optimal frequency with an optimal ohmage load that will deliver that amount of power. 99.99% of the time it is not putting out that power, but it can. I don't mean to argue with you guys, but electronic is my life (besides messing with my car, gambling, golfing and ******* it is what I have the most fun doing).
Are you guys sre you re even arguing, It seems like everyone is saying the same thing, tecnicalities aside.
RMS has another aspect that is being neglected here. THD. The kenwood head unit will only produce a consistant power of 22 watts per channel at 1% distortion. Yes with much more distortion at a single frequency and impedance (even if a speaker never shows that impedance at a any frequency) the unit is capable of 50 watts for a short time.
However, these spec's can and are screwed in about 1000 ways including, voltage, impedance, and distrotion levels. This is where knowing the car audio industry and its various brand reputations come into play. This is why CEA2006 has become a big issue as of late. Both the 22x4 and the 50x4 are marketing watts, they aren't typicly even realistic. Hell for all we know the 50x4 power rating was measured at the units peak input voltage of 16 volts powering a 2 ohm resistor at 20% THD before it exploded and took someones eye out (headshake
The main thing I was orginaly disagreeing with was that you said,
"Nothing is rated in full bandwidth power, everthing is compared at max power."
When in car audio that is indeed the most common unit of comparison. Also the comments about frequency ( bandwidth) are hard to understand as it seems that you are saying that a devices bandwidth (atleast as the user is using it) is un-improtant. To me the needed bandwidth is the only area is which a meausrement is relavent.
Another thing to keep in mind here is that technical descriptions are only good to a point in consumer electronics as 99.9% of consumers will not know or understand alot of the terminology, and certianly not the math, laws, theories and equations. I am sure you and servo could go indepth far over my head in that areana if need be as both of you guys have high levels of seducations but that are points when klnowing enough will get you buy so to speak. For instance what was the concept of the atom when electricity was first utilized by man? Since then we have come along way in our understanding of electricity and the atom yet the observations ( even though based on not 100% correct information as we know it today) were correct enough to be succesful. Its also like the saying "knows enough to be dangerous". SOmetimes its best to leave concepts out of various peoples hands, I am reminded of the women that formatted her hard drive becuase here printer stopped working. Sure the previous problem that was causeing the printer not to work is gone, but so is everything else.
To sum it up, Guys like Servo and you get to know the most indepth mathmatics behind electronics, the rest of us use various levels of dumbed down explinations that although might not be technicly accurate all the time, they are typicly correct in a broad sense most of the time.