M5s marketed incorrectly?

I am not sure how Honda is considered so reliable. They have had tranny issues going on and off for many years. The only people I know who have had tranny issues were Honda /acura


Sent from my Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note 3

They USED to be dead reliable. You can drive them 200-300K without any issues. Since htey had the V6s, lots of tranny problems since the mid 2000s.

Not as realiable anymore...but they once were
 
They USED to be dead reliable. You can drive them 200-300K without any issues. Since htey had the V6s, lots of tranny problems since the mid 2000s.

Not as realiable anymore...but they once were

It depends on which one you choose. I traded in a 2008 Honda Fit for my M5 and I can tell you the Fit is one of, if not THE most reliable car you can buy. At least it has been since it's been built in Japan. Check Consumers Reports, True Delta, JD Power, anything you want. It is astoundingly reliable and had the lowest cost of ownership of any car.

That said, Honda has fallen a bit from it's pedestal of perfect reliability. I blame cost-cutting, resting on their laurels and...perhaps decisions like this boneheaded move to build the Fit in Mexico. It was a car with one of the most flawless reliability records there is and as soon as they moved production they suddenly have an embarrassing failure in quality control that forces them to bring the cars back in and delay delivery to the dealerships. They managed to built 2 generations of Fit's for the last 13 years in Japan without this problem. Just sayin'...
 
I've not been impressed with the build quality in our Alabama-built Odyssey. The drivers door and fender were misaligned when delivered, causing the paint to rub off the door and fender. Nothing like buying a car on a Saturday and going back to the dealer Monday morning to point out a flaw that shouldn't be. This was May, finally got approval from Honda at the end of August for it to be fixed. Lots of small things that most folks won't notice, like mold-part lines being visible or easily scratched trim pieces.It's those small things that Honda used to be very good at.

Honda is still good at those things, if you pick the right Honda. A previous gen Fit, the S2000, an Acura built in Japan. But it is a shame that level of quality isn't pervasive throughout their lineup the way it once was. The old Honda never compromised when it came to that kind of thing.
 
Bias Honda fan here though I don't like their more recent offerings. I see them as truly an Engineering company first, car company 2nd. I like that.

I thought the Honda tranny issues were limited to the Automatics in their V6? Did they have issues with the I4 engines and/or manuals too? My brother had a 00 auto V6... IIRC, I thought the issue was the torque converter failing bc tranny gets too hot, burns fluid, leads to failure. My coworker had a '11 (?) TL but religiously maintains it and had the ATF changed (non car guy, full service by shops). I last rode with him with 110k and his tranny never had a failure. Anyhow, isn't tranny a non issue now? Just to add, that Alabama (?) made Accord sucked ass.

Honda's manual transmissions are excellent. I can't speak to the automatics as I've only ever owned two cars with automatic transmissions and it wasn't by choice haha.
 
It depends on which one you choose. I traded in a 2008 Honda Fit for my M5 and I can tell you the Fit is one of, if not THE most reliable car you can buy. At least it has been since it's been built in Japan. Check Consumers Reports, True Delta, JD Power, anything you want. It is astoundingly reliable and had the lowest cost of ownership of any car.

That said, Honda has fallen a bit from it's pedestal of perfect reliability. I blame cost-cutting, resting on their laurels and...perhaps decisions like this boneheaded move to build the Fit in Mexico. It was a car with one of the most flawless reliability records there is and as soon as they moved production they suddenly have an embarrassing failure in quality control that forces them to bring the cars back in and delay delivery to the dealerships. They managed to built 2 generations of Fit's for the last 13 years in Japan without this problem. Just sayin'...

I have owned a 87 and 91 Wagovan. The predecessor to the Fit.

My moms Honda Jazz (Fit) has 385K miles. ALl original. My dad's NSX has 418K miles, daily driven since 1992. No snap ring problem even.

Honda can build good cars. I am a fan boi. My AP1 S2000 had bulletproof 168K miles till I traded it on the AP2.

Their TL-S tranny probs, Accord tranny probs, Ody tranny probelms haven't helped.

I love the current gen Accord Sport Manual trans 4 door. Wish the manual trans didnt come in only 2 colors. Otherwise I would trade my MS3 for the Accord Sport.
 
Agree, though I support bringing home jobs, imports built here have lost quality. My in-laws are Toyota fans and I have driven their cars since the 90s. To me the recent models are the worst quality. Might be a quencidence, but all the recalls and problems seem to align to them making them in the states. As for tranny problems on Hondas, never have had a problem on the ones I had, but they were manuals.

Edit: I was answering to last page comment lol.
 
Last edited:
^^
tOYOTA has been building cars in the US, long before the 90s....


THere is a thread on the Outback forum, on Subaru being built in USA vs Japan. Interesting read...
 
^^
tOYOTA has been building cars in the US, long before the 90s....


THere is a thread on the Outback forum, on Subaru being built in USA vs Japan. Interesting read...

I can has link plz? K thx.
 
Honda is still good at those things, if you pick the right Honda. A previous gen Fit, the S2000, an Acura built in Japan. But it is a shame that level of quality isn't pervasive throughout their lineup the way it once was. The old Honda never compromised when it came to that kind of thing.

The build quality on my folks Canadian made 2012 MDX was very good, so was our Marysville made 2006 Accord. But Acura money should bring better quality. And 8 years is an eternity in the auto business.
 
Honda's manual transmissions are excellent. I can't speak to the automatics as I've only ever owned two cars with automatic transmissions and it wasn't by choice haha.

I had an 88 Legend with a manual. It was an entirely different animal to drive(more fun) than the 89 auto I had. And the 88 was an old used car by the time I had it in early 2000. That shifter was nearly as good as the Miata.
 
I can has link plz? K thx.

Yep, he's right I can confirm this.

Toyota's first wholly-owned U.S. plant opened in Georgetown, Kentucky in 1987.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota_Motor_Manufacturing_Kentucky

Prior to this they had a factory in Fremont, Californina they operated jointly with GM called NUMMI, New United Motor Manufacturing, or something like that. That was technically Toyota's first shot at building cars in the U.S. and it opened in 1984.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NUMMI

NUMMI built the Toyota Corolla based Chevy Nova there, followed by the Geo Prizm model that was a rebadged Toyota Corolla along side some of the Corollas for the USDM. That was followed by the Pontiac Vibe (a rebadged Toyota Matrix and the Toyota Matrix itself were built there too I believe. A certain number of Toyota Tacoma pickup trucks were built at NUMMI for a number of years too.

Toyota and GM closed the plant some years ago. Interesting bit of trivia: Tesla actually bought the old NUMMI plant and it is where Tesla builds their cars today.
 
I was asking for a link to the Lafayette-made Scoobys versus the Japanese ones.
 
Back