all these fancy words and yet you still ake no sense. the weight i was actually reffering to is the 1999 si coupe not the new si wich weighs 2744lbs wich is still 4 lbs lighter than the stock 1999 si. i understand that its a cool swap (the k20 into si) but coolness doesnt make you any faster unless you on the set of fast and the furious, but in this case its real life and in real life its not and i repeat not possible for two equally skilled drivers driving those cars and the rsx comes out the victor its just not right. intake header and exhuast on the rsx maybe 30 whp and the mustang picked that up with just a chip.
Im new but here are some kills
- Thread starter 03.5YellowMSP
- Start date
- Status
wow, i try to leave it on a civil note, and you're quick to come back to get the last word in.
i don't care if you THINK my facts are twisted. it's apparent you don't know how to comprehend facts when you're bringing up "specs" on the wrong car.
i had an opinion, so i posted. since then, it's turned into entertainment.
i like mustangs a hell of a lot more than i do honda/acura. i just "feel" that it's "possible" that the si "could" win in "this" situation.
now, if this was about which car could get into the 11's easier, different story completely.
i don't care if you THINK my facts are twisted. it's apparent you don't know how to comprehend facts when you're bringing up "specs" on the wrong car.
i had an opinion, so i posted. since then, it's turned into entertainment.
i like mustangs a hell of a lot more than i do honda/acura. i just "feel" that it's "possible" that the si "could" win in "this" situation.
now, if this was about which car could get into the 11's easier, different story completely.
- Status
