GM going down?

Matthew

Member
Contributor
:
CX9, CX5, i8
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,158798,00.html

GM to Cut 25,000 Jobs, Close Plants Tuesday, June 07, 2005
foxnews_story.gif
<table align="right" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="262"> <tbody><tr> <td>
</td> <td> <table align="left" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="20"> <tbody><tr> <td id="story" onclick="storyTab('story',2);" style="border-left: 1px solid black; background-color: black; color: rgb(255, 204, 0);">STORIES</td> </tr> </tbody></table>
Fitch Cuts GM Credit Rating to Junk

Kerkorian Files Offer for 28M GM Shares

S&P Cuts GM, Ford Credit Ratings to 'Junk'

Ford, GM Sales Lose Out to Imports

GM Posts $1.10B Loss Worst Since 1992

GM CEO Wagoner Takes Over N.American Car Operation

GM Says May Abandon One of Its Brands

Report: GM Mulls Massive White-Collar Cuts



<script language="JavaScript">writeScroll(openTab2,'2');</script>
</td></tr> </tbody></table> General Motors Corp. (GM) plans to eliminate 25,000 jobs in the United States in the next few years by closing additional plants, as it battles high costs and shrinking market share, the company's chief executive said Tuesday part.

Speaking to shareholders at GM's 96th annual shareholder meeting in Delaware Tuesday morning, Chairman and Chief Executive Rick Wagoner (search) said the capacity and job cuts will generate annual savings of roughly $2.5 billion.

Wagoner said at least 25,000 U.S. jobs would likely be cut in the period 2005-2008, from an hourly work force that stood at 111,000 at the end of 2004.

The world's largest automaker has been closing and idling plants over the past four years, reducing its annual assembly capacity from six million vehicles in 2002 to five million by the end of this year.

GM shares gained 31 cents to close at $30.73 on the New York Stock Exchange (search) after rising as high as $31.16 earlier in the session. GM's shares have tumbled to their lowest price in more than a decade, and Fitch Ratings and Standard and Poor's Ratings Services both reduced the company's bond rating to "junk" status last month.

<script type="text/javascript" language="JavaScript">google_ad_client = 'foxnews_440x100';google_ad_width = 440;google_ad_height = 100;google_ad_format = '440x100_pas_abgn';google_safe = 'high';</script><script type=\"text/javascript\" language=\"JavaScript\" src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"></script><iframe name=\"google_ads_frame\" src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/ads?client=ca-foxnews_440x100&dt=1118189465734&adsafe=high&lmt=1118189463&format=440x100_pas_abgn&output=html&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com%2Fstory%2F0%2C2933%2C158798%2C00.html&ref=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com%2F&cc=92&u_h=1024&u_w=1280&u_ah=990&u_aw=1280&u_cd=32&u_tz=-420&u_his=12&u_java=true&u_nplug=19&u_nmime=64" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" vspace="0" hspace="0" allowtransparency="true" frameborder="0" height="100" scrolling="no" width="440"><img></iframe><noscript>
imp.gif
</noscript>​
The GM job cut announcement was the biggest in the United States since Kmart (search) unveiled plans to cut 37,000 jobs in January 2003, according to John Challenger of outplacement firm Challenger, Gray and Christmas Inc.

"This may not be the last major job cut announcement we see this year as other companies, including other American automakers, struggle to make a profit amid escalating health-care costs, not to mention the cost of providing ongoing health benefits to growing ranks of retirees," Challenger said in a statement.

Analyst Michael Bruynesteyn of Prudential Equity Group said eliminating 25,000 or more hourly jobs through 2008 would only be in line with the normal 5 percent annual retirement or attrition rate at GM.

"These plans are not surprising given market share losses and efficiency gains but we do not think they should be viewed as a new strategy," added Goldman Sachs analyst Robert Barry.

"If market share continues to fall over time, as we expect, then GM is really just treading water with such actions, not boosting profitability."

Wagoner focused on priorities for clarifying the role of each of GM's eight brands, intensifying efforts to reduce cost and improve quality and continuing to search for ways to reduce skyrocketing health care costs.

He noted that the company's current $1,500 per worker health-care expense puts GM at a "significant disadvantage versus foreign-based competitors," and said GM has conducted "intense discussions" with the unions about how to reduce health-care costs.

Billionaire investor Kirk Kerkorian's (search) offer to purchase 28 million GM shares at $31 apiece, boosting his stake to about 9 percent from 4 percent, expires later today.

It was not immediately known which GM plants would be closed. GM has already closed several facilities this year. The company shut a factory in Linden, N.J., in April and a factory in Baltimore in May, affecting around 2,000 employees. The company also closed two plants in Lansing, Mich., last month, although those 3,500 employees are expected to find work at other GM facilities in the city.

"Let me say up front that our absolute top priority is to get our largest business unit back to profitability as soon as possible," Wagoner said.

Part of that bid involves negotiating with the United Auto Workers (search) and other unions, discussions that are ongoing.

Wagoner said the talks, which he described as intense, have focused on a cooperative approach to significantly reduce GM's health care costs. GM's health care tab for its 1.1 million current and former workers and their families is more than $5 billion a year and rising.

"We have not reached an agreement at this time, and to be honest, I'm not 100 percent that we will," Wagoner said of the ongoing talks with its unions. "But all parties are working hard on it, in the spirit of addressing a huge risk to our collective futures while providing greater security and good benefits for our employees."

To date, the UAW has indicated it won't reopen its contract, which expires in 2007, and agree to pick up a larger share of soaring health care costs.

Aside from growing health care and pension costs, GM has had lackluster sales lately of its highly profitable trucks and sport utility vehicles, which have been hurt by high fuel prices.

GM's sales were down 5 percent in the first five months of the year, and the automaker reported a $1.1 billion loss in the first quarter.
 
They're not going down. In oreder to compete with other car makers they have to streamline their manufacturing more. The union is incredibly inefficent and they can save money by outsourcing parts overseas. They will probably drop Buick by the end of the year also and consolidate some product lines.
 
Matthew said:
it would be nice to see buick gone forever. their s*** sucks.

all the buicks are is normal gm cars with different body parts, ex, the regal and the pontiac grand prix
 
/\ wow your car looks great, i think this is the first time i've actually seen it, loving the bronze rims with the yellow car!
peace
dante
 
the government wont let GM go down. too many jobs at stake. they will bail them out just like the did for chrysler.
 
GM is a symbol of Americana, so it'll stay. I honestly think this is healthy for GM. They'll become smaller and smaller of a company, realize what they need to do better, and then re-explode onto the scene with much better quality.

Either way, I just hope they don't kill off Pontiac, too. My GF just bought a G6 :)
 
I hate to say it but, GM deserves whatever happens to them. Let's count the number of worthwhile cars... Corvette... ummmm ummm... well their trucks are solid... other than that, basically uninspiring piles of crap they turn out these days.
 
^^^ I dunno SilverB...everyone loves the Pontiac GTP's....and around my way all the inherently Rich people buy those New Cadillac sedans (braindead
 
GM (as well as Ford) will always have a huge number of fleet sales. So they'll never go down.

BTW 'Buick' is one letter away from 'Brick'
 
To bad they wont bail out the airline industry like United Airlines. GM's brand and service, and quality is horrible, it would be sad to see that many people lose there jobs, but I absolutly despise them. I said it when they slumped to junk bonds, by 2006 GM will most likely be toast, UNLESS they do something really drastic, to bad they have to go to laying people off, instead of improving the brand.

As a business owner myself, I understand cuts are sometimes neccessary, but GM is so centered around a TYPE-CAST car that is why they are loosing out on so much of the market share.

And if i hear one more 9/11 excuse i will barf. They had great deals with the 0% stuff. But they pumped those things out like hot cakes, and by doing this the quality sunk to a alltime low. The envoy itself has had over 27 recalls on everything from tranny to blinkers. You ever notice how many brand new suburbans and escalades you see with the right front daytime running light out, tons. Well actually 1.3 million give or take a thousand to be exact.

The brand catored to geriatrics, and big family living. And didnt even glance at the youth market, by far the biggest demo out there. Toyota, sure is hurting.... But no wait.. GM gaves us the almighty cavalier, it has push rods for gods sake. Now they finally come out with th cobalt, ugly but functional.

American brands will never ever ever be able to compete with the japanese, on any level of car manufacturing, or pretty much anything for that matter.

They have little hands...come on what beats that.

Plus I can honestly say, every car they have is Ugly. I cant think of one thing I like, or even care about.

So the answer I give, is yes i think GM is going down hill. Will it die off, no. They have to many offshore companies that do ok. Like, Fuji heavy industries.

I guess they did something right by buying into a japanese company.
 
Last edited:
SilverBulletES said:
I hate to say it but, GM deserves whatever happens to them. Let's count the number of worthwhile cars... Corvette... ummmm ummm... well their trucks are solid... other than that, basically uninspiring piles of crap they turn out these days.

ws6
 
SilverBulletES said:
I hate to say it but, GM deserves whatever happens to them. Let's count the number of worthwhile cars... Corvette... ummmm ummm... well their trucks are solid... other than that, basically uninspiring piles of crap they turn out these days.

there trucks are far from solid....
 
Worthwhile GM vehicles:

Corvette, Cobalt SS, Solstice, G6, GTO, the new Caddy line up, Saab line up, and most of their truck line up is pretty solid. I've also heard good things from people about the Buick LaCrosse, but I have not driven one so I won't comment on that.

Other GM cars, like the Bonneville, Grand Prix, Impala, Monte Carlo, etc. are all good cars, just not what most people on here are looking for. But they're nice as a highway cruiser that doesn't have to pull 0.9g's and they get good gas milege. I could get 30mpg on my Olds Intrigue with the 3.8.
 
No wonder they are doing the "everyone gets the employee discount" thing. I guess they are just really desperate to sell something. I'm glad I bought stock in Japanese car companies.
 
Back