No, i couldnt drive it hard because there was a line into the mall... so she had plenty of cool down time before stopping.
No like you originally said Haltech the 15 minutes of idleing and then driving usually causes the smoke to pour out too.
No, i couldnt drive it hard because there was a line into the mall... so she had plenty of cool down time before stopping.
Well, here's my theory: Since this smoking thing seems to happen mostly on the cars that have had the exhaust system modified, this is what may be happening...
First off there are plenty of guys that say " I had a brand X car with a DP and a cat back exhaust and the turbo never smoked so therefore the turbo in my MS3 must have a bad seal".
But we are talking about a different engine in the Mazdaspeed cars - it's a direct injection engine, and that is worlds apart from a port fueled engine.
The reason that Mazda gets away with such a high boost level on an engine with such high compression is the cooling effect of the fuel being injected directly into the combustion chamber. This quenching action allows for aggressive ignition timing maps which in turn allow high performance and good mileage (relatively speaking).
This is a very delicately balanced system. When one mods their car with CAI's, DP's and removes the cats and mufflers, one has seriously changed the total engine package.
This smoke seems to happen when the car is made to idle for long periods of time. My theory is this: Without the catalytic converters and exhaust system restrictions (read mufflers and resonators) the car, when idled, looses all the combustion chamber heat and starts to have an unburned fuel condition. Since there are no cats to gobble up the smoke, out the tail pipe it goes. If the cat were in place, heat would stay in the combustion chamber and the fuel would be better vaporized and burned.
Also, the CAI's may have a hand in this-they increase air flow and, when coupled with a DP and no cats, increase air flow through the entire engine. Could the engine management system (or brain if you will) detect that, while the throttle is closed, the mass air sensor is showing a slight increase in air flow and the brain bumps up the fuel rate to match it? The combustion chambers are already cooled off from not doing much of anything and then more fuel is added - thus the smoke.
Naturally, the minute you start driving the car the smoke clears and all is well until the next prolonged idling session. This theory is sort of validated by the fact that when the cars are returned to stock, the smoking problem goes away. I believe that the smoke we are talking about is unburned fuel. The amount of smoke we're talking about, if it were oil, would surely show up on the dipstick sooner or later.
I have seen the same phenomenom in the first generation of common rail injection diesel engines. One decides to mod for more HP, changes the engine air flow characteristics and at idle there is profuse smoke!! Actually, it's quite hilarious!!
This is just a theory of mine and what I have told you and $75,000 will get you a cup of coffee on Rodeo Drive, California. Cheers and Merry Christmas all!!!
Are you serious. We all (no most, because you don't) know why the cars smoke. There is a turbo seal issue. The smoke is a hazy white with tints of blue like oil not black like raw fuel. Some cars loose as much as 1qt of oil every 1250 miles.
Im still waiting for Haltec to confirm this is the type of "white smoke" he is seeing and until then Im sticking to the "its steam" comment albeit with the smart ass reply he gave me I suspect it is as you are describing
So is it a real seal issue? Someone posted(in a diff thread) that the design needed backpressure to work properly and by adding hi-flow catback etc... the backpressure wasnt enough to properly keep the seal... sounds like a long shot to me but hell what do I know I still think its steam![]()
Are you serious. We all (no most, because you don't) know why the cars smoke. There is a turbo seal issue. The smoke is a hazy white with tints of blue like oil not black like raw fuel. Some cars loose as much as 1qt of oil every 1250 miles.
Im still waiting for Haltec to confirm this is the type of "white smoke" he is seeing and until then Im sticking to the "its steam" comment albeit with the smart ass reply he gave me I suspect it is as you are describing
So is it a real seal issue? Someone posted(in a diff thread) that the design needed backpressure to work properly and by adding hi-flow catback etc... the backpressure wasnt enough to properly keep the seal... sounds like a long shot to me but hell what do I know I still think its steam![]()
+1
This is white/blueish smoke that people are seeing, not black, unburnt fuel smoke. I don't really know why people are still "guessing" as to what the problem is. Mazda already has a revised turbo with different seals and different part number and has replaced many defective turbos which eliminated the problem.
Seems to me there is no doubt what the problem is. There are stock turbos out there with leaking seals > Mazda has a replacement turbo > if your seals leak, go to Mazda and get it replaced. Problem solved.
Sucks to hear that happened to you Haltech but at least you're still under warranty and should be getting a brand new turbo. Let us know how the trip to the dealer turns out.
I wonder why this hasn't garnered a recall from Mazda if indeed these turbos are letting oil into the combustion chamber.
If they'd admit somethings wrong and get on it right away, they'd save themselves the cost of replacing a catalytic converter in the process.
If the EPA gets involved, thats exactly what will happen if they determine that the catalyts were poisioned by the oil.
You know, the EPA eats cases like this up!!! It'll be interesting to see if, after a new turbo is installed, does the turbo smoking stop and stay that way. Anyone who gets a new turbo (especially someone with a modded exhaust system) needs let us know periodically how it's going. Has a lot to do with whether Mazda gets to sell me a new car in the future. I don't mind them making a mistake as long as they make good on the car. Too many other turbo cars on the market to accept Mazda being a bad player here...