CX-5 Fuel economy and range all over the place

Mreed1988

Member
:
Cx-5
Hello.

Sadly the other day I discovered my battery dead in my mazda cx5. I jumped the car and had a sequence or error messages the first was about the parking brake and then about the battery management system failure and Istop. All these messages have cleared themselves but I am now finding the cars fuel economy to be shocking. Before this happened I was averaging around 42 mpg now I'm struggling with around 32/33. I have also noticed the fuel range to be very up and down having swings of 30 or 40 predicted miles.

What may have happened? Thanks.
 
I had this on my 2013 Touring. Since that number is an average it will 'settle down' as more miles get calculated.
 
Disconnecting the battery probably reset all the sensor values to the default levels, your driving style will slowly return. Ed
 
How you are people getting these insane mileage numbers? I never got anything close to 30s, much less 40s on a full tank.

On the highway, it is pretty simple. Set the speed to the speed limit plus 5 mph. In suburbia, don't accelerate to a red light or stop light. Accelerate quickly to the speed and back off the gas. And don't drive like you are in a S2000.
 
How you are people getting these insane mileage numbers? I never got anything close to 30s, much less 40s on a full tank.
OP has i-stop, he uses mpg, these means he could be in UK. His CX-5 could be a 2.2L diesel, averaging around 42 mpg is a possibility with bigger British gallon (1 Imperial Gallon = 1.201 US Liquid Gallons).

I simply can’t imagine OP can get 42 mpg averaging with a gasoline engine, even if he has a SkyAcyiv-G 2.0L and calculated with Imperial Gallon.
 
In the UK for this one - I filled up with petrol and 2 days later when I went to the car it was dead - the door would open (weirdly) but could not open boot or nothing on dash - I got a jump start and everything OK except radio memories wiped! - drove the car to ensure battery was ok - it took 20 mins for the range gauge to rise from 0 and it went all the way up to 506 miles (!!!!) - never shown anything higher than 435 miles - what could have caused this? - how reliable now?
When I switch engine off and restart the gauge shows a range of 506 miles ....
Car starts OK but I am wary - the key fob working OK - but it wouldn't before the jump start.
Not sure the battery was dead - it appears more that the 'systems' were dead which 'woke up' once the car started.
Ideas please
 
On the highway, it is pretty simple. Set the speed to the speed limit plus 5 mph. In suburbia, don't accelerate to a red light or stop light. Accelerate quickly to the speed and back off the gas. And don't drive like you are in a S2000.

You would think that being a sensible and efficient driver is the logical thing to do.

Majority of drivers on the road indicate otherwise.
 
I'll say it everytime I see a mpg thread. CX5 sucks for mpg. I won't recommend to anyone looking for a sensible SUV. My wifes 2022 Tuscon Limited gets better. I drive 66 miles for work daily. I rarely driver over 70mph. While the terrain is hilly I can't get any better then 25 overall. If I drive 55 max causing for a longer commute I see 27/28 on a trip.
 
I'll say it everytime I see a mpg thread. CX5 sucks for mpg. I won't recommend to anyone looking for a sensible SUV. My wifes 2022 Tuscon Limited gets better. I drive 66 miles for work daily. I rarely driver over 70mph. While the terrain is hilly I can't get any better then 25 overall. If I drive 55 max causing for a longer commute I see 27/28 on a trip.

My Mazda 6 with the same drivetrain, fully tuned, averages 40-45mpg.

44+ If I'm driving particularly conservative. Involves waiting for a downhill to speed up, otherwise just maintaining whatever momentum I have, coasting, gentle on the up hills.
 
I have been averaging 25.6 mpg here in Cape Coral FL. I'm not a hyper miler but, just drive normally to go with the traffic flow in my city.
 
How old is the air filter? Changing it improved my CX-5 mileage.
If your talking to me I have 7800 miles on it. From the gate it has sucked on mpg. I thought after a few thousand miles and oil change it would increase but it hasn't. To me it is the main flaw and will be the reason I don't stay with Mazda.
 
If your talking to me I have 7800 miles on it. From the gate it has sucked on mpg. I thought after a few thousand miles and oil change it would increase but it hasn't. To me it is the main flaw and will be the reason I don't stay with Mazda.
I don't see other crossovers Significantly more efficient.

Buy a smaller car, not a jacked up crossover.
 
I'll say it everytime I see a mpg thread. CX5 sucks for mpg. I won't recommend to anyone looking for a sensible SUV. My wifes 2022 Tuscon Limited gets better. I drive 66 miles for work daily. I rarely driver over 70mph. While the terrain is hilly I can't get any better then 25 overall. If I drive 55 max causing for a longer commute I see 27/28 on a trip.

How you are people getting these insane mileage numbers? I never got anything close to 30s, much less 40s on a full tank.
I get an average of 36 mpg - I drive like a 'bat outta hell' - coast at 77 mph on the motorways - WHEN I ONCE restricted my speed to a top speed of 60mph on a 400 mile trip I returned 44 mpg - this goes to show that IF you restricted speed to 56 mph max then 50 mpg is achievable .... (but a boring way to travel ....!)
This is in the UK, where roads are narrow, and driving is aggressive - generally.
 
I get an average of 36 mpg - I drive like a 'bat outta hell' - coast at 77 mph on the motorways - WHEN I ONCE restricted my speed to a top speed of 60mph on a 400 mile trip I returned 44 mpg - this goes to show that IF you restricted speed to 56 mph max then 50 mpg is achievable .... (but a boring way to travel ....!)
This is in the UK, where roads are narrow, and driving is aggressive - generally.
Since you are in the UK, I am assuming you are measuring in Imperial gallons and not US gallons. The mpg figures are lower when measuring in US gallons.

With that said, my non-turbo CX-5 did 33mpg (US) on its longest trip which was mostly on 2-lane highways. That would be in the high 30s in mpg (Imperial).
 
I get an average of 36 mpg - I drive like a 'bat outta hell' - coast at 77 mph on the motorways - WHEN I ONCE restricted my speed to a top speed of 60mph on a 400 mile trip I returned 44 mpg - this goes to show that IF you restricted speed to 56 mph max then 50 mpg is achievable .... (but a boring way to travel ....!)
This is in the UK, where roads are narrow, and driving is aggressive - generally.

Since you are in the UK, I am assuming you are measuring in Imperial gallons and not US gallons. The mpg figures are lower when measuring in US gallons.

With that said, my non-turbo CX-5 did 33mpg (US) on its longest trip which was mostly on 2-lane highways. That would be in the high 30s in mpg (Imperial).

The imperial gallon is 20% larger than a US gallon, plus the OP has a 2.0-liter motor while most of us have the 2.5.
 
We go to OBX in July. Western PA to Avon, NC. Can't wait to see what I get down and back. I'm gonna try to drive slow and air up the tires some. I hope for 30mpg.
 
I don't see other crossovers Significantly more efficient.

Buy a smaller car, not a jacked up crossover.
I had a chevy cruze prior to this. Great mpg but the miles starting getting high and along came the issues so I sold it. It was a 2013 with a auto 6 spd. Jump forward 10 years to this 2023 cx5 and it has a 6 spd while others are 7/8/9 speeds. Gearing and a transmission for mpg would help. My wife has a 23' Tucson and gets better mpg. Any guess why?
 
Back