Super Unique
Member
- :
- 2008.5 Mazdaspeed 3 Black Mica
What's really funny is we spend all our time worrying about how cool we can keep the incoming air, and hypermilers worry about how they can heat the intake charge for better mileage 

This is just wrong. A turbo doesn't heat the air to some pre-set temperature, nor does an intercooler cool whatever it gets to exactly ambient. If you feed the turbo ambient air, it will get hot when compressed. If you feed the turbo hot air, it will get REALLY HOT when compressed. Likewise, an intercooler won't be able to cool the charge air all the way back down to ambient temp so the hotter air you feed it, the hotter air you get out of it.SRI or CAI, it doesn't matter. Why? Simple. Once the air enters the intake it goes to the turbo where it gets compressed. When air gets compressed it gets hot. Much hotter than the ambient air temp. So, no matter what intake you have, the air will be the same exact temp once it is compressed by the turbo charger. The air is then cooled by the intercooler before entering the TB, and then the cylinders. If you want to lower intake temps get a larger intercooler on top, or even better a FMIC. That will make a difference.
Personally, I think the box will be well worth it not only for improved charge density but also for the ECU aspect.Highway Driving:
COBB Intake no box: Max 124 degrees F, Avg. 91.6 degrees F
COBB Intake with box: Max 108 degrees F, Avg. 74.9 degrees F
Difference of: Max ~16 degrees F, Avg. ~16.7 degees F
City Driving:
COBB Intake no box: Max 149 degrees F, Avg. 117.4 degrees F
COBB Intake with box: Max 111 degrees F, Avg. 87.5 degrees F
Difference of: Max ~38 degrees F, Avg. ~29.9 degrees F
Idle (~5 mins):
COBB Intake no box: Max 149 degrees F, Avg. 133.5 degrees F
COBB Intake with box: Max 113 degrees F, Avg. 99.2 degrees F
Difference of: Max ~36 degrees F, Avg. ~34.3 degrees F