In the case of the 2.0 TFSI, I can see a bit more clearly the opportunity for gains with a retune....this is after all the same engine that makes a lot more power in "Audi form" than when it has the Veedub badge. The same was true for the 1.8T if I'm remembering correctly.
That is the thing with VW, the engines are so detuned from the factory it is "easy" to get a ton more power out of them. With the MS3, the engine is pretty highly tuned from the factory and makes a bunch more power as is from the dealership.
On a personal note, I think I am going to schedule my free 5 hour trial of the Stage 1 ECU upgrade for my car for early next week. It is great, you go to the authorized tuner, they flash your car for free, and you have 5 hours of driving time to experience the tune before you spend the $$$ on it. How awesome is that!
Don't understand why this is such an amazing concept for you? If I don't end up trading it in for an MS3, I know I am going to get an ECU reflash from the company APR (http://www.goapr.com/VW/products/ecu_upgrade_mkvgtitsi.html) for my 2008 VW GTI that brings it from 200hp and 207 ft/lbs to 254hp and 297 ft/lbs. That is a pretty amazing difference for like $500-$600.
This has been common in the VW community for years now. Got to love forced induction and stout german engineering...........Although, they don't appear to know all that much about reliable electrical systems.........
Those VW tuners were literally strangling the small turbos on the 1.8t motors with some of the more wild tunes on the market. I've seen videos of turbos on those motors glow bright orange because of the amount of boost the remap called for. Hardly safe IMO. And on a VW/Audi where reliability is always a concern I don't know if that's such a good idea!
On a personal note, I think I am going to schedule my free 5 hour trial of the Stage 1 ECU upgrade for my car for early next week. It is great, you go to the authorized tuner, they flash your car for free, and you have 5 hours of driving time to experience the tune before you spend the $$$ on it. How awesome is that!
That's a pretty sweet deal for you...and some clever salesmanship from them!
And to the OP, yeah you're neighbor is a tad optimistic. If that s60 has the T5 engine it could go up to easily go to 300 with several goodies on it (again see the Focus RS), but it wouldnt last long making that power with just a chip IMO.
You should let him go up to 400 and take that race (in a closed circuit of course), just make shure it lasts for about an hour; I'm pretty shure you'll have a big laugh when his engine grenades!
The engines were never VW's problem.......it was just everything else.........I know the current Stage 1 tunes for the VW/Audi 2.0T boost around 17-19psi at the peak. Tons and tons of people are running these tunes without issues, as long as you buy from one of the big 3 companies (APR, REVO, GIAC). They are in the business of large power gains, stock driveability, and long-term reliability.........if the tunes were damaging engines, people would stop buying them. The companies have built their reputations around safe power. Even in other factory trims(Audi), the same 2.0T engine produces like 50 more hp and 50 more ft/lbs than in the GTI/VW application..........They simply did not want to give the consumer more power for the price.
The engines were never VW's problem.......it was just everything else
Thats cheaper HP than the MS3 provides by a long shot =(
Because I think 30% is a lot of power to miss from the start that a simple chip can add. Why is that hard for you to understand? It seems if that is a case, the car starts poorly tuned. I have heard guys talking about chips adding 40% - 50% gains... Does that sound reasonable to you?
Adding 10% - 15% (as in the case of the MS3) with a piggyback unit / chip is fine. Maybe even 20 - 25%, but the incredulous meter starts rising as you start creeping into the 30%+ region. Why you ask? Because a moderate knowledge of physics tells me you don't get something for nothing. When you don't change anything about the physical properties of an engine, comments about 90 HP (30% gain for a 335) gain are hard to swallow. I suppose if we have proof, then there you go. But I am less inclined to just believe that without a dyno.
That said, should I believe my neighbor who told me he can drop a chip in his 2005 Volvo S60 that takes it from 257 HP / 258 torque to 400 HP / ?? Torque? (We talked about this two nights ago.. He said he can just get a chip and make it 400 HP and "crush" my MS3.... clearly he is "chip" sycophant.)