Bov! Oh Crap!!! Help!

I don't think that's the cause of the high LTFT's. I had pretty much the same as Dale when I had the Cobb SRI. 10.2 at idle and 14.8 accelerating. I put the factory airbox back on and they dropped to -3.9 and -0.8. I swapped them back and forth a couple times to make sure I hadn't left something loose and got the same results. With the Nano they are +4.7 and +7.0. It's something to do with the Cobb for sure. Isn't that about what you are getting with your Nano also?
 
Nah. With my nano I'm 0.0 or 0.8 at idle, and -3.9 or -2.7 under even the heaviest throttle. Wish I knew the difference for y'alls sake. Maybe DaleNixon and I can have a workshop on this when he's feeling better. Do you have sport or GT?
 
Nah. With my nano I'm 0.0 or 0.8 at idle, and -3.9 or -2.7 under even the heaviest throttle. Wish I knew the difference for y'alls sake. Maybe DaleNixon and I can have a workshop on this when he's feeling better. Do you have sport or GT?

Mine is a 2008 GT. I have the dry filter on my Nano. I don't remember which one you have. Maybe that is why my numbers are different than yours? I'm not unhappy with mine as they are. In fact, that wasn't the reason I switched to the Nano from the Cobb. I understand that the car can adjust up to +-25.0 on this, so as long as it's not over about half that and isn't increasing with time I don't think it's a problem at all.
 
I have an oiled filter. I'm used to oiling filters on R/C cars, so this didn't scare me. Still, I hear others with the amsoil dry are fine... Can't figure the common variable...
 

New Threads and Articles

Back