The two biggest hinderances to the 2.5t making good power are the size of the turbo and tuning software. Factory turbo is close in size to an early WRX factory turbo for comparison, the CX-50 twin scroll is slightly bigger. Anything over 28lbs a minute of airflow is maxing both turbos out in stock configuration and starts making considerable heat. RPM limit on my car is currently 6300rpm, the engine handles it no problem but the turbo is having issues keeping up.
Mazdaedit just does not have the tables defined needed to control a bigger turbo correctly. We need access to the compressor simulation maps, turbine efficiency maps, P/R maps, etc. If we get that amongst all the boost tables fully and correctly defined then we are dealing with a significant power jump potential. The cylinder head has the flow to support over 400hp, the cams are fairly aggressive for an OEM turbo engine, all the 2.5ts have 256* intake duration, all except the CX-50 run 232* exhaust duration, the CX-50 runs 250*, this is close to the same intake as the 4B11T in an Evo X and more exhaust. Because of the large amount of VVT control we can spool a large turbo relatively quickly.
Better software will enable the next big push in power for the cars.
Mazdaedit just does not have the tables defined needed to control a bigger turbo correctly. We need access to the compressor simulation maps, turbine efficiency maps, P/R maps, etc. If we get that amongst all the boost tables fully and correctly defined then we are dealing with a significant power jump potential. The cylinder head has the flow to support over 400hp, the cams are fairly aggressive for an OEM turbo engine, all the 2.5ts have 256* intake duration, all except the CX-50 run 232* exhaust duration, the CX-50 runs 250*, this is close to the same intake as the 4B11T in an Evo X and more exhaust. Because of the large amount of VVT control we can spool a large turbo relatively quickly.
Better software will enable the next big push in power for the cars.
Last edited: