Ok, normally I dont bother to debate with someone clearly out of his league. But, I have 34,000 reasons to be adamant about this topic. So, bear with me, this is worth reading!
First, before I continue with Mazda3s issues everyone who reads this needs to understand that
the only reason Im posting anything is that my CX-7 AWD has a serious vibration at highway speeds and Mazda has declared it normal and is refusing to fix it or replace the vehicle. I need everyones help to determine if this is a widespread issue. As for Mazda3s assertion this seems to be isolated well, Mazda is aware of at least 4 units with this issue.
So, Mazda3, at the end of the day, if you are driving for several hours non-stop and experiencing no vibration you are part of my proof that Mazda is lying.
Now, as to your assertion that your post on the design of the system is right out of the Mazda Canada training manual then one has to wonder. How is it, then, that the information you provided is exactly identical to this posting from Dec-08?
http://www.mcx7.com/archive/index.php/t-1659.html
see superstretch18 post most of the way down the page.
How is it that you have access to the training manual? And, in a form that allows you to copy/paste? And, why didnt you use that resource instead of this persons posting? Also, interesting to note that the poster of this info gives no other information to backup the validity of his post. The only other source of this quote I have found is from a Canadian car forum review. It is identical to information posted on the MazdaSpeed6 and CX-9 but never appears for the CX-7 in any other source US or Canada. And, this source is NOT an official Mazda publication! By the way, mazda expert I have validated your information as mostly correct for the MazdaSpeed6 from an official Mazda publication. That means nothing here.
Note that the vehicles Mazda builds for Canada are different from the USA in many ways. Nothing that I have found, in over a year, provides that level of information for the US models.
Finally, although it is certainly possible that you have conversed with engineers, reps, managers, and VP's many times I find that HIGHLY unlikely unless, of course, you work for Mazda Canada. In which case, you have no credibility with me after my experiences with MazdaUSA. Note, too, that I work in management for a super-major oil company and I can tell you, it is nearly impossible to get access to VPs anytime much less many times! Mazda has actually refused my request to discuss this issue with someone at only the Director level forget about VP level.
I have stood face-face with the MazdaUSA District Engineer. This is the person in Mazda that makes the final decision as to whether a vehicle is broken, defective, repairable or a lemon and must be replaced. As I said before, he looked at me with astonishment when I asked him about the type of details you posted. He told me that the car I own, 2008 CX-7 AWD USA model, has only a PTO on the front transaxle and an hydraulic clutch in the rear differential that grabs when the spin rate is different from the front wheels. There are NO controlling electronics, no cooperation with the traction control system or anti-locks, nothing... you get 100% front or 50/50. It doesn't have a clue what is happening to the car. Why would a person of this authority, degreed engineering training and access directly to the Mazda engineers in Japan tell me something Mazda3 asserts is completely wrong. You decide who to believe Im going with the Mazda District Engineer.
So, as I have said, my concern is NOT with how it is designed it is with how it was ultimately built. And, according to Mazda, the defective vibrating AWD system is as designed.
Not only am I willing to testify to the information Ive presented here in a court of law it is quite possible I will be in the near future. So, Mazda3, if you dont mind either put up or shut up if you want to add value, then pass this info along to one of your VP friends. Perhaps they can influence Mazda to help me. Otherwise, you are just making childish noise in a serious conversation.