Saskatchewan17
Member
- :
- 2008 TR Mazdaspeed 3
Looks pretty damn good to me! Get an FMIC then you'll break 300 without a sweat.
now just wait for everyone else to call :bs:
That's about right for a dynapack. They report higher numbers than roller dynos because they do not account for traction loss or rotational mass from the front wheels. Personally, I prefer dynapacks for their consistency.
Nice power curve OP. Did you use the same dyno for your baseline numbers? Would be interested in seeing the graph if you did. (2thumbs)
thats the only graph i have
More proof that dyno numbers really are all over the place (i.e. the absolute numbers are meaningless).
298 HP on one dyno might easily be 268 HP on another.
If big numbers are important, go with Dynapack.
More proof that dyno numbers really are all over the place (i.e. the absolute numbers are meaningless).
298 HP on one dyno might easily be 268 HP on another.
If big numbers are important, go with Dynapack.
Don't any dyno outfits calibrate their dynos on a regular basis? It only took about 3 minutes to calibrate the mustang dyno I have use for engine tuning. Something isn't making sense...