215/45/17 work OK on MP3s?

zbillster

Member
Has anybody run 215/45/17 tires on their MP3 wheels? Just wanna make sure it won't rub or anything. The new Mazdaspeed is running the 215s instead of our 205s so I figure it would be OK.

I'd prefer NOT to go to a 40 series.
 
I think you'll be fine if you're going to leave your car stock height. But, those are just my thoughts
 
If you go with the 215's get 40 and not 45. The 45's are taller because of course the 45 means 45% of the tire's width. I just got 215's and they are a little taller than the originals. Patrick has the 215/40's and they look like the same hight as the original. The 215's work fine though. They are actually better because they are wider and they provide more rim protection.
 
While a *bit* taller, the 215/45/17 has less error than the 215/40/17 compared to the stock. The 45 is 1.5% over, the 40 is 2.0% under. I found this from using the tire size calculator:
http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html...

I'm still debating lowering an inch with the Eibachs and going 205/45/17, or going stock height with the slightly wider tires. I think I'm leaning towards lower though...

Chris
 
That's a really cool calculator! I've never seen that. I like the idea of the speedo telling me I'm going 80 when I'm really going something like 78 though. It will probably save me from a ticket or two!
 
I think I'll go for the 215/45 (I'll be keeping it stock height). I like to have a good chunk of sidewall for real world driving in crappy streets. Also I get a better selection vs. 205/45. Thanks for all the input.

Thanks for the calculator link (I wrote a C program for that in school but can't find it).
 
just what size tire comes on the MP3??? because the differnce between the stock tire on the P-5 and using a 215/40/17 is only .4 % NOT 2.0%

and by going with the 215/45 it puts the error at 4% slow.

that would lead me to believe that if the numbers you got are correct...that either the speedo's are calibrated differently between the mp3 and the other pro's....or there is a hell of a lot of error in ONE of the cars.


yes I got those numbers using the very same tire calculator.....
 
Last edited:
DooMer_MP3 said:
While a *bit* taller, the 215/45/17 has less error than the 215/40/17 compared to the stock. The 45 is 1.5% over, the 40 is 2.0% under. I found this from using the tire size calculator:
http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html...

I'm still debating lowering an inch with the Eibachs and going 205/45/17, or going stock height with the slightly wider tires. I think I'm leaning towards lower though...

Chris

I def like your caculator better...
http://robrobinette.com/tire_diameter.htm

...this is the one I use to use
 
just what size tire comes on the MP3???
The stock tire on the MP3 is a 205/45-17.

Question though, what is the tire calculator based on? I found that and used it often when I got my Miata but I have been recently lookling for replacements for the MP3 and I see a great deal of difference in the calculator versus the specs of the tire. I have been using the size but also the revs per mile. The stock tires have 871 revs per mile. If you go to Bridgestone Pole Position S-03 you get a 215/40-17 that has 875 revs per mile and if you go to the Michelin Pilot Sport you get a 215/40-17 that has 872 revs per mile. If you look at the calculator, it says the stock tires get 831 revs per mile and a 215/40-17 will have 848 rev per mile. The only other thing I can think of is that tire manufactures quote revs per "canadian" mile ;)

MP3#872
 
225/45's damn those are some beefy tires there. I know you're planning on lowering your car with those mounted on. You would most definately rub.
 

New Threads and Articles

Back