2.0t03speed
Member
- :
- 08.5 CWP Speed 3
no wing>wing
Best wingless msp
- Thread starter MSPRCRX44
- Start date
Outlawstar98
Member
- :
- 2003 MazdaSpeed Protege / 2013 BRZ
same here,im still woundering if the WRX's one will fit, cause i know they have that in carbon fiber XD
different strokes for different folks... personally i love the cars without the wing. Removing the wing makes the car appear lower and longer. Also i'm not a big fan of body work that doesn't "do" anything. All our rear wing does is create drag - removing it improves quartermile times and trap speeds by improving aerodynamics.... whilst this might not sound "important" to many people, reduced drag also means improved fuel economy...
but yeah, if you like it, keep it.... personally i think wingless looks awesome
justanothermp5
Banned
- :
- Rust Bucket
what kinda exhaust is that?
We Are Ninja
Member
- :
- 2006 Mazdaspeed 6 GT; 2004 Mazda 6 Wagon
I felt the exact same way for the first six or so months I had the car. Then I got to looking at MP3Architect's and CitizenPro's and D-Rock's cars. The wing started to look more and more "boy racer" and obtrusive to me. I bit the bullet and went wingless, and have no intention of going back. Wingless definitely makes the car look longer and leaner.
Not me. I get enough "Nice Subaru" comments as it is... (bang)
Last edited:
You hit the nail right on the head. I drove a speed and it felt like I couldn't see anything out of the rearview mirror. I think a more subtle wing like kooldinos would be the only spoiler I would consider.
ChrisMikai
Member
Sorry I don't see it. It looks more like an econo box without the wing. Even with the ES wing. I took it off and put on the 3.5 wing and thought, yup that makes the boyracer car.
If the roof line going to the back was more like the BMW 3 series I could see it. But it comes down, then you have the trunk.
Even the older Audi A4 looked good without the wing because the rear roof line mated up with the trunk nicely.
It was made this way because it is a boy racer car. Stop making it what it isn't.
My 0.02 cents.
If the roof line going to the back was more like the BMW 3 series I could see it. But it comes down, then you have the trunk.
Even the older Audi A4 looked good without the wing because the rear roof line mated up with the trunk nicely.
It was made this way because it is a boy racer car. Stop making it what it isn't.
My 0.02 cents.
We Are Ninja
Member
- :
- 2006 Mazdaspeed 6 GT; 2004 Mazda 6 Wagon
And it looks like "an econo box with a giant wing" with the wing.
I have no problem with the car being "boy racer-ish", I just don't want to shout it from the rooftops. Aesthetics are subjective. To each his own. (wiggle)
ChrisMikai
Member
yup
We Are Ninja
Member
- :
- 2006 Mazdaspeed 6 GT; 2004 Mazda 6 Wagon
Yes. An econobox with an obscenely tasteful lip kit and a giant wing. It's a good look, too. But, take off the wing and you get "clean, understated econobox with an obscenely tasteful lip kit" look.
I definitely prefer the clean, understated look more... (thumb)
Last edited:
ChrisMikai
Member
I know what your saying.
Like on the BMW 3 series, I wouldn't put on a wing.
It looks good with out it for sure.
Even the new Mustangs, I like the Shelby little spoiler lip they have then the smaller GT wing.
The Shelby looks sick.
To each his own I guess. But, I like the 3.5 wing on our cars. Makes it look different.
Like on the BMW 3 series, I wouldn't put on a wing.
It looks good with out it for sure.
Even the new Mustangs, I like the Shelby little spoiler lip they have then the smaller GT wing.
The Shelby looks sick.
To each his own I guess. But, I like the 3.5 wing on our cars. Makes it look different.