- :
- RDX Aspec Adv.
I barely get 25mpg on road trips now. Why would I want a cheap suv that got worse mileage and required premium and was still in the "not fast" category? It's like an expensive hooker with a butterface that also has no body,lol
It also blew up your engine faster, LOL.
Its ok Chris, not everyone is able to drive stick, doesn't make you any less of a driver.
If Mazda puts in the 2.5 turbo engine into the CX-5, it won't just be a few more extra HP. A turbocharged AWD CX-5 will be a mainstream alternative to a BMW X3 and Audi Q5, minus the reliability and luxury expenses.I find it funny how people driving 4 year old cars(i.e any CX-5) are seriously thinking about 'upgrading' to the latest model all over a few extra HP. Seriously? Is it really worth the depreciation hit just for a few HP and maybe a couple of new options? New cars depreciate the most during the first 4 years. Don't be one of these brainwashed fools who thinks trades out their cars every 4 years. Drive you're existing CX-5s and enjoy them for a long time. Last car payment I had($500) was in July 2005. Once that was paid off I starting paying 'myself' that car payment in the form of an Index and have built-up nearly 100k.
I looked up this tuner and I have some reservations after going through this thread
https://www.mazdas247.com/forum/showthread.php?123854085-OVT-tune-group-buy
I think hes an amateur tuner and after what happened to Chris, he can't be trusted. I also think you are a fake account used to promote him without paying dues to the forum. Shame on you.
3. Also dave has been posting on mz247 since before ovt appeared in the cx5 forum.
Don't come on here spreading false information, lies and assumptions. Knowing the platform helps too.
I had a few relatives visiting last week for a funeral. Fully packed the CX-5 with 4 adults + 1 kid and a full trunk that blocked the rear window (and a Curt hitch), driving back and forth between home, funeral home, and temples was a breeze. I might have been a speeder as usual, but the Mazda can easily pull ahead of the CR-Vs, Venza, and Highlander in the family. Of course, at this point I'm well-versed in controlling the throttle and using Sport/manual-shift when needed (only used Sport mode once to get around a slow Odyssey) so that's an unfair advantage. The rides were comfortable enough for my wife to sleep during the trips.
I'd love to try out a turbo CX-5, but will happily skip if it introduces reliability issues and delay in spooling up. So far I'm happy with both performance, handling, and look. Of course, the "child" in me still want to try out all new cars, but that's probably not a wise option financially.
Part of me wants to make the car more luxury (a little quieter, a little more convenient, ...), but I don't want it to be something that is so delicate that I have to baby and be careful, and loosing all the fun of throwing it around.
I find it funny how people driving 4 year old cars(i.e any CX-5) are seriously thinking about 'upgrading' to the latest model all over a few extra HP. Seriously? Is it really worth the depreciation hit just for a few HP and maybe a couple of new options? New cars depreciate the most during the first 4 years. Don't be one of these brainwashed fools who thinks trades out their cars every 4 years. Drive you're existing CX-5s and enjoy them for a long time. Last car payment I had($500) was in July 2005. Once that was paid off I starting paying 'myself' that car payment in the form of an Index and have built-up nearly 100k.
Sounds like you would be perfectly happy with a Mazda6 wagon. Unfortunately they don't sell those here.More power is not required at all. The current 2.5L has enough power for this type of vehicle, as it is not a sports car.
Instead, better millage, better refinement will be appreciated.
Unless something unexpected happens, I will keep this car for as long as planned. Even then, I am not likely to buy the same car with a stronger engine, unless it would also be more efficient. Ideally, I'd like a lower to the ground, hopefully a hatchback or wagon with AWD. If more sporty, it will absolutely need to be a lower and lighter vehicle, with lower center of gravity and better wind drag resistance.
Sounds like you would be perfectly happy with a Mazda6 wagon. Unfortunately they don't sell those here.
... with AWD. Exactly right! The rest of the world understand the benefits.Sounds like you would be perfectly happy with a Mazda6 wagon. Unfortunately they don't sell those here.
What's wrong with making the CX-5 more luxury?
What model Highlander?
Almost every year and model is SIGNIFICANTLY faster than the CX-5 2.5 AWD.
https://www.0-60specs.com/toyota-highlander-0-60-times/