Well, I heard a PGT with a GReddy (the SP2, I believe) cat back and it sounded the best of the 3 that were in the exhaust review clip. I think it was a GReddy, Magnaflow and Pace Setter. The Pace Setter cat back sounded terrible. Angry bees indeed! Which kinda scares me when picking out a header since the Pace Setter gives you the most power but also sounds the angriest. I know the PS and OBX headers will fit the P5/KL swap so it's pretty much a choice between those two. But I haven't done my research on headers yet. I do a weeks worth of research on a specific part, then buy it. Then start all over again with the next part. I haven't made it to the header yet.
Yeah, I've seen that vid, too. That kinda stinks that the header that makes the most power on the KL sounds the worst and the better sounding one makes less power. I guess it then comes down to whether or not you'll notice a few hp vs if you want to hear a nasty sound every time you drive the car. Hotshot is another header.
I guess I don't understand this logic. Power does not "fall off a cliff" but like any car beyond its peak power point it starts to drop quite noticeably. My reasoning is that I'd rather shift just beyond the point of peak power so I'm right in the sweet spot when entering the next gear. I don't understand the logic in holding it to 9000 RPM where the engine is probably outputting only 3/4 peak power only to shift and still be at a point below peak power. Also, peak torque always occurs lower than peak power so the acceleration wouldn't be there either.
Bear in mind this is for a stock engine so there are obviously many ways to shift the power curve. Ideally, I'd have peak power being made between 8000-9000 RPM. For some reason the rotary's power curve seems far more succeptable to shifting after simply mods than the FSDE. Even after all the mods to my P5 it still made peak power at 6000 RPM and peak torque at 3500 RPM albeit substantially more, LOL.
Actually, the MS3 power curve does just about fall off a cliff. Most cars don't, this one is a special case after the turbo goes out of its efficient range.
I can't for the life of me find the thread where I read about this exact discussion. I remember I concluded that for spirited driving, shifting right after the power band so that the next gear will climb up the band again, in effect "feeling" the most powerful. However, when it's time to race, the gearing advantage outweighs the small difference in the power band that you gain. I realize this is totally hypothetical, but let's say that the difference between the peak power and the power at the top of the rev limiter for a given car is only 20hp. That 20hp difference is outweighed when the gear ratios are multiplied in, as they are when the car is driven. I hope this is making sense, I don't really know how to explain it.
As best I can remember, you take the individual gear ratio, multiplied by the final drive, and that's the total gear advantage. Unless the it's a super close ratio gear box, the mechanical advantage offered by the more "powerful" gearing of the lower gear will outweigh the difference in the power curve between the point of peak power and the down slope of the power curve.
I wish I had more math under my belt to know about the differences of hp vs torque, but you can either make torque through the engine, or you can make it through the gearing. I guess that's what I'm trying to say. I'm still not convinced that torque is important because there are things that go against the grain of "torque monsters" like old muscle cars, such as Hondas, rotaries, and of course, F1 cars. And for the diesel trucks to become fast, they have to make more hp. There are some sickeningly fast diesel pickups out there, but they make more hp than torque, which is opposite of how they come from the factory.