Any photographers in here?

Original:
Peacock_Original.jpg

did you shoot in jpg? if so, what were your in-camera settings? I can color boost JPGs as I take them, and they come "straight out of the camera" already boosted, contrasted, and sharpened. If you want to post original photos, the unedited direct conversion of the RAW to JPG is the one to compare. They're usually very ugly, even on photos that turn out fantastically.
 
Remember to shoot at the lowest ISO possible to get the best color reproduction because at higher ISO's the colors wash out quite a bit...especially on my D80.
 
Not the greatest photos in the world, but they are from Lime Rock Park this past weekend.
Shot with a Canon 350D/Rebel XT and a 28-135mm IS.

IMG_0899.jpg

IMG_0922.jpg
 
did you shoot in jpg? if so, what were your in-camera settings? I can color boost JPGs as I take them, and they come "straight out of the camera" already boosted, contrasted, and sharpened. If you want to post original photos, the unedited direct conversion of the RAW to JPG is the one to compare. They're usually very ugly, even on photos that turn out fantastically.

No, I shoot RAW 100% of the time. :)
 
Nice shot! Do you guys need to shoot through chain-link fencing or anything?

For some reason.. all of the animals at the zoos I go to are behind thick fencing or behind dirty glass. >_> ANNOYING.
 
sometimes yes, sometimes no. For the monkey, there is only a moat, which I have to shoot more over than through... ;)
 
I'll paypal a dollar to anyone who can tell me what those beadlooking things are on his head/neck...
 
Nice shot! Do you guys need to shoot through chain-link fencing or anything?

For some reason.. all of the animals at the zoos I go to are behind thick fencing or behind dirty glass. >_> ANNOYING.

Ya I gotta shoot through fences. Shooting at shallower DOF's help depending where the subject is compared to the fence.

Anyways guys..here's a new video I just put together. Critique!

Shot w/ a Nikon D5000 @ 640x480 with a Nikkor 50mm 1.4 lens. All manual focus

http://www.vimeo.com/12223972
 
I don't know... they were on both sides... I doubt a tag would go straight through that part of an animal's neck for scientific purposes...
 
are there different kinds?


This one is the kind that Floridians get as a pet and then release it because they are too lazy to take care of it. Not sure what the scientific name is.
 
Aren't they markings? Like for some sort of science research etc? Tags?

I'm thinking that might be correct:

Affixing colored glass beads to the nuchal crest has recently become popular among investigators studying large iguanas (Rodda et al. 1988; van Marken Lichtenbelt et al. 1993; G. Gerber and A. Alberts, personal communication; W. Hayes and R. Carter, unpublished studies). This method, developed for iguanas by Rodda et al. (1988), can be applied not only to adult iguanas but also to juveniles, as the number and sizes of beads affixed to the crest can be adjusted for animal size. Pain and ill effects associated with the procedure appear to be minimal. Occasional loss of the beads has been noted (Rodda et al. 1988; W. Hayes and R. Carter, unpublished observations), most likely resulting from degradation of beads (especially if plastic) and suture material (usually monofilament line), or biting of the beads by conspecifics. Glass beads not only retain their color better than plastic beads, but are also superior in resistance to crushing. Suture material should be selected for resistance to degradation by ultraviolet light. The beads are fairly visible from a distance, especially with the aid of binoculars, making this technique valuable for mark-recapture studies.

Source: http://www.iucn-isg.org/actionplan/ch3/marking.php
 

New Threads and Articles

Back