626 intake manifold anyone??

amair001

Member
:
2001 Mazda Protege MP3
Just wondering if anyones put a 626 IM on their MP3??? Any problems you ran into? Tips for installing.. etc...
 
so many threads on this its not even funny. i have sold hundreds of these to various protege owners over the last three years. generally the gains are better on turboed cars, but you will see a 5whp top end gain on a dyno on a non turbo car.
 
would the gains be better on an n/a car if i were able to tune in the extra air flow with my microtech??
 
would the gains be better on an n/a car if i were able to tune in the extra air flow with my microtech??
Yes.

Even without the manifold, you'll see plenty of gain with the Microtech. Tune for more air, less fuel and more timing advance.

And there is little different about the MP3 manifold from any other 3rd gen Protege intake manifold. The MP3 does not have the VTCS butterflies, but those are fairly easy to remove. I did it.

There is a guy, "snake eater" or some reference to Metal Gear Solid Snake username, has one on his MP3.
 
ive noticed that it does need more air and less fuel, after i got my awr race header on i noticed that it was running rich, you can smell the unburt gas after driving
 
you will lose at least a few low end ponies from this on a non turbo car, just to forewarn you
 
i've already noticed a slight lose in the low end with the exhaust. should I be worried about losing too much on the low end?
 
n/a mods on this engine typically put power in the top end, so its not unusual. if you are looking for more low end, this manifold is not going to be the solution.
 
n/a mods on this engine typically put power in the top end, so its not unusual. if you are looking for more low end, this manifold is not going to be the solution.

exactly right...especially given the lack of decent NA tuner parts available for the car...

if you want low end (or more to the point, a more USABLE power band) you are better off designing and building your own stuff...

For example, if you were to make your own intake manifold, with the correctly tuned intake runners, right matched plenum volume, and a tune length/diameter intake pipe, you can create plenty of usable power NA. In fact, you can actually dial the runner length in according to exactly where you want the power to hit. The formulas are quite easy to work with, the problem is fabricating a part! The 626 manifold is good because its there to be had, and it does give some gains (which has been proven time and time again). A couple of hours and you've changed it over....instead of the weeks of measuring, fabricating, test fitting, tuning, adjusting and hair pulling that will go on with building your own stuff.

Having said all that, going to a management system can really help fill up some of the low end loss you experience when working the motor NA - by feeding the motor more aggressive timing, and dialing the fuel in, you can at least go SOME WAY towards making up for what you will lose with a mod like this...
 
a 7 lb flywheel should do the trick, lol

That'll quicken the rate that the motor revs at (by removing rotating mass...plenty of ways to do this...UDP, lightened crank etc etc) - but its not going to appreciably change the loss in power.

tis a good mod though, makes it easier to get the motor up where it likes making power...makes rev matching/double clutching a bucket load easier too!
 
so i just got a turbo, so im having it rebuilt and slapping it on the mp3. anyone know if you can have the im ported out and if it would make any noticeable gains
 
Back