2008 Dodge Caliber SRT-4 $81 Per Horsepower
- Thread starter mikeyb
- Start date
- :
- 2011 Mustang GT
I'll wait for one of the magazines to compare the MS3 to the SRT-4. I have a feeling that the MS3 will still be top dog.
+1 In photos it looks ok, but in person is where it fails. Yup, still a "Neon" to me.
your car is pure sex! sorry to go off topic!
To me this just proves how crappy dodge's interiors are, the seats are nice, but this part just makes me think cheap. Looks like the 01 galant I use to have. Not good.
I kinda have to agree. I think all of their cars have that square look to them. I can see it in my jeep, but not for a truck or car.
BlackCherry06
Member
- :
- '17 CX-3 GT
I actually like the looks of it, right up until after the rear doors where it takes a seriously awkward turn. The lowered stance, ground effects and front air dam make it looks light years better than a SXT or R/T. The wheels are essential to the looks as well. But that back end....major afterthought. I like the muscular, somewhat mean look of the nose. I just think it is having a hard time deciding what it wants to be. A car-ish wagon-ish SUV?
Putting that ugly ass aside, my chief complaint is the lack of an AWD option in the Caliber's flagship model. Stupidity at its finest. The bottom-feeder models offer it, but you get to bald your front tires on the real performer of the family. At least Mazda doesn't offer AWD on any American 3, so you don't feel like you've been jipped when you can only buy a FWD MS3. Since the hardware is available, Dodge would have been smart to engineer it to handle the 2.4T's output and offer it.
Putting that ugly ass aside, my chief complaint is the lack of an AWD option in the Caliber's flagship model. Stupidity at its finest. The bottom-feeder models offer it, but you get to bald your front tires on the real performer of the family. At least Mazda doesn't offer AWD on any American 3, so you don't feel like you've been jipped when you can only buy a FWD MS3. Since the hardware is available, Dodge would have been smart to engineer it to handle the 2.4T's output and offer it.
WTLW. They've shown the undisguised HHR SS several times. You can see the MT article here:
http://www.motortrend.com/features/auto_news/2007/112_0708_2008_chevrolet_hhr_ss
Chrysler can't make a good interior, period. My Jeep's interior just looks and feels cheap, and the ergonomics are terrible. Very underwhelming for something with a $40k+ sticker. They might turn it around, but this isn't going to be the way.
http://www.motortrend.com/features/auto_news/2007/112_0708_2008_chevrolet_hhr_ss
Chrysler can't make a good interior, period. My Jeep's interior just looks and feels cheap, and the ergonomics are terrible. Very underwhelming for something with a $40k+ sticker. They might turn it around, but this isn't going to be the way.