cranking up the booostt

If you go on any car forum there are tons of threads like this. Every car has weak points that break.
 
If you go on any car forum there are tons of threads like this. Every car has weak points that break.

And some are meant to last. My 323 has stock original internals with a slightly bigger turbo on 16 psi has 190k and was rallied for a few years. Still runs strong and hopefully will untill spring when it gets torn down. I had 6+ 20psi spikes due to a bad boost controller as well

Keep in mind I'm talking rally not autox rally is rediculously hard on any car
 
Once I get the car running with the 505 intake manifold and PEP downpipe, I am going to beat the living s*** out of it(that is if the manifold doesn't change my tune that much)...lol. Especially after how long my car has been down.

Let me know how that goes, because for some reason my car doesn't hold boost when I try and get it tuned..
 
Getting into the subject of the restrictive exhaust I thought thought the muffler was pretty restrictive too?
Can't decide on either adding a y pipe to my pope dp for when I want to have fun and leaving the stock exhaust for dd or just do 3" all the way back with stock muffler
 
I'm not sure if anyone mentioned this but removing cats does not increase your fuel consumption. Removing cats mean less restriction, so if anything they help your FE.
 
Reason i thought the catdelete could casuse fuel consumption was I had a bad o2 sensor on the cat with my civic and because it was not reading the proper air flow, it made the ecu think that it needed more fuel. Hence we are on this subject, i know our cars are pretty reactive to larger exhaust pipes, but from an engineering stand point, 2.25 is optimal to powerbands of 230hp. I read it online somewhere. So just curious if 2.25 is optimal for us howcome we still go 3inch? Its kinda contradicting each other.
 
Reason i thought the catdelete could casuse fuel consumption was I had a bad o2 sensor on the cat with my civic and because it was not reading the proper air flow, it made the ecu think that it needed more fuel. Hence we are on this subject, i know our cars are pretty reactive to larger exhaust pipes, but from an engineering stand point, 2.25 is optimal to powerbands of 230hp. I read it online somewhere. So just curious if 2.25 is optimal for us howcome we still go 3inch? Its kinda contradicting each other.

We go 3" because our "LONG TERM" goal is to achieve 350-400hp.
 
I'm back to considering a 3" exhaust, but am concerned with excessive noise.
 
How do you like it during normal driving?

There is a bit of lag while shifting under 3.5k normal driving, but nothing to noticeable.

I'm back to considering a 3" exhaust, but am concerned with excessive noise.

Yeah it's pretty loud, but it's not annoying. I have the Vibrant Race Muffler which sounds nice and aggressive while driving compared to your average 4 banger.

Warm Start
 
Last edited:
I am without 2 cats too 63mm up to resonator and Autoexe rear muffler and flow is good. It s goodest bo-bo-bo in lo rpm and in highway like stock p5! I listen Tanabe rear muffler in 323 f europe 2.0 its more aggressive then Autoexe. So will we Euro 0! )))
 
Back