- :
- Protege 5
Rickman said:
play gt4 with the logitech wheel. its an experience like no other
Which is more realistic?
- Thread starter JCell
- Start date
play gt4 with the logitech wheel. its an experience like no other
CommieSpeed
Member
- :
- 2003.5 Titanium-Gray Mazdaspeed Protege
Im all set with GT4. I hate the way it controls compared to Forza, and the physics engine is not nearly as advanced. GT4 calculates 40something times per second, where as Forza does 250something per second. I hate how the Physics engine s**** the bed sometimes, Ill take a turn the same way 500 times and one of those times Ill completely spin out for no reason, having nothing to do with tire wear. And nobody say I suck at GT games, **** you, I've played everyone all the way through except for 4, which I have at 40something percent. PLus the lack of online play and the INEXCUSABLE graphical glitch that makes it look like s*** on my TV will make sure I never touch it again. Oh, and If GT4 is so realistic, why are the 400m times so rediculously out of wack? Oh my 400hp car runs a 16.9?!? Come on.
Tell you what JCell, that civic R you were driving, go take your car and try turning at the same speed. Also, like in real life, left foot braking is the only way to make a FF turn at speed. Try using gas/brake at the same time. I think GT4 is quite accurate in this aspect. FF's understeer..who knew!? Forza is a piece of s*** arcade game. It's sluggish and the braking system is god awful. The only cool part is the weight effect, however, it's too NFSU for me..
CommieSpeed said:
Mike your a ******* idiot. Moreover, completely biased because of a glitch on your display. Forza is a piece of s***, and your 400hp 16.9 is because you didn't work with the LSD or suspension to hook it up. There is so much more going on that you don't even see.
JCell said:
Yup. Some 24 hour ones, some 9 hours ones, etc.
I don't understand what all this bickering is for. I have already definitively told you all that GT4 is more realistic. End of discussion. But Forza is still damn fun even though it loses in the realism and graphics categories. As for the GT4 graphical glitch - are you talking about the screen jitter that happens before races and during replays? If so, yeah that is annoying. I don't know how they could have left that in there after developing the game for practically half a decade.
i guess it's not so bad then
i forza, u have to actually drive around in lesson tracks and it rates how fast you corner, brake, and accelerate out of the turn in percentages
then when u use it, if u have a 70% on 90% turns, the drivatar wil only do the turn at 70% of teh cars ability
i forza, u have to actually drive around in lesson tracks and it rates how fast you corner, brake, and accelerate out of the turn in percentages
then when u use it, if u have a 70% on 90% turns, the drivatar wil only do the turn at 70% of teh cars ability
I like gt4, but I like Forza even more. Here's where Forza beats GT4 : BRAKING. In gt4, I can take any car, with any brake set up, and stop on a dime. Were's the realism in that? In Forza, if I brake as late as I do in gt4, then I can enjoy sliding way off course. Also, in gt4, there's no sliding of any kind. I should be able to toss my 700hp '69 mut around some corners dammit! If I floor it, it sould break loose, not just plow forward like a brick. In gt4, all the cars are nothing more than mobile bricks. If by some chance you do manage to break 'em loose, they just loop around on you. It's either that, or severe understeer. Also, the power to weight ratio has always been absurd in the gt series. An original 60's mini cooper(not in gt4, lame), with 160hp should frickin' haul ass. But no. It barely moves. ?!!!! And it won't corner for crap either. Rediculous. I've been in an original mini, and that thing was a frickin' slot car on the mtn road. Again, I still like GT4, but it's just not THAT realistic. All the cars just handle to similarly.
girth said:
The jittering is because V-sync is turned on (the framerate is locked at 60 hz, without triple buffering), and it's an interlaced signal. So only half the screen gets updated at 30 fps. To fix this problem, they would have had to disable V-sync which would cause graphical glitches and possibly inhibit unknown features of the engine designed to function with the frame rate cap, figure out a system to scale the LOD, or just reduce the graphical quality altogether, all of which would be distracting and noticable all the time instead of just at the beginning of a race. It sucks but I think the developers made the right decision given the circumstances
crispixoo7
Member
- :
- 95 Protege 5spd. and 92 Miata 5spd
toucci said:The jittering is because V-sync is turned on (the framerate is locked at 60 hz, without triple buffering), and it's an interlaced signal. So only half the screen gets updated at 30 fps. To fix this problem, they would have had to disable V-sync which would cause graphical glitches and possibly inhibit unknown features of the engine designed to function with the frame rate cap, figure out a system to scale the LOD, or just reduce the graphical quality altogether, all of which would be distracting and noticable all the time instead of just at the beginning of a race. It sucks but I think the developers made the right decision given the circumstances
huh? (uhm)
crispixoo7 said:
The game engine has a problem with how it draws the image to your screen. Rather than change it, which could cause a ton of bugs out of no where, they desided to keep it in the game. Bascially you get sweet graphics all the time with that ugly jittery effect every once in a while vs jittery all the time.
