Matthew said:i agree on the anti-votes. could be that asshole turbo matty/insanoman/super matty...anyways, that ***, who doesnt like MAM just because everyone posts good thigns about himwhich is stupid.
which brings up a good point? how is it that that moron is allowed on the forums after repeated bans? what did he do, bribe antoine with some money?
Yup...he seems to be "civil" now although I will never forget what he did nor will I ever trust him...
werdRyanJayG said:yeah, I kinda think the Anti votes (atleast without explaination) are kinda ghey...
I know Beau very well, and I know for a fact he quickly corrects any mistake or problem that is his fault at his expense. I'm thinking there is a little envy/ tired of hearing about how great Beau is, going on here.
but who knows... MAM with anti votes is kinda funny to me, thats all.
Thats exactly what I'm saying though. They aren't wasting their vote because they were never really going to vote anyway. People who vote for someone just to spite the other should take the option of just not voting. Or you could have put in a "none of the above" option instead. Since we all know we are talking about MAM, who has honestly been screwed over by MAM? We would have heard about it by now. Sure they have had some issues occasionally with shipping and such, but they were all taken care of personally at Beau's expensive to be corrected. Thats not screwed over that's just "s*** happening." I see what you were trying to do, and it would probably work better if people couldn't see the the results until it was over, and no one posted who they voted for as well. That way no one can vote against someone in the lead for the hell of it. but I suppose its too late anyway.. just a suggestion for next time maybe...kooldino said:Then they waste their vote. I just wanted to include some kind of check and balance. If 90% of the community thinks company XYZ is great, but 10% of the community really got screwed over by them, I want this to reflect that.
That will only cause drama. No offense, but let it go, man. (hippy)mp5jeff said:maybe for people who vote anti they should explain their "bad experience" or their anti vote becomes void? i dunno, just don't want to see this good idea ruined...
Way to make assumptions.Matthew said:i agree on the anti-votes. could be that asshole turbo matty/insanoman/super matty...anyways, that ***, who doesnt like MAM just because everyone posts good thigns about himwhich is stupid.
There's no bribing going on.which brings up a good point? how is it that that moron is allowed on the forums after repeated bans? what did he do, bribe antoine with some money?
They still have that option. I just gave them one more.Familia323 said:werd
Thats exactly what I'm saying though. They aren't wasting their vote because they were never really going to vote anyway. People who vote for someone just to spite the other should take the option of just not voting.
What the hell would the point of that be?Or you could have put in a "none of the above" option instead.
A blind vote would be nice, but I didn't see any options for that when I did it.Since we all know we are talking about MAM, who has honestly been screwed over by MAM? We would have heard about it by now. Sure they have had some issues occasionally with shipping and such, but they were all taken care of personally at Beau's expensive to be corrected. Thats not screwed over that's just "s*** happening." I see what you were trying to do, and it would probably work better if people couldn't see the the results until it was over, and no one posted who they voted for as well.
That way no one can vote against someone in the lead for the hell of it. but I suppose its too late anyway.. just a suggestion for next time maybe...
so have the people who do the "anti" votes pm you with why they are voting that way, you don't have to disclose their names, how would that create drama?Kooldino said:That will only cause drama. No offense, but let it go, man. (hippy)
Sorry.. I just mistook this as something that was meant to be serious.Kooldino said:Besides, if they can vote against someone out of spite, why can't they vote FOR someone for an equally silly reason? Six of one, half dozen of the other guys. Do the math...in the end, it'd all work out about the same. This way just allows people to express themselves differently if they choose to. Case closed.