Interesting question. I remember way back on that infamous article where our beloved MSP-turbo(MP3) was in a shootout with the Ferrari, Elise et-al, the authors claimed that a cars handling is ULTIMATELY determined by the driver. How that cars handling inspires (or doesnt) inspire confidence to push the car to its engineered limit. I really really agree with that definition of what the term "handling" ultimately means.
Thats why I really adore our MSP's handling b/c it really inspires confidence to approach its limits, limits which are pretty damn high.

And it is easy rectify the situation when the limits are crossed. I have a friend with a S2000, a car that theoretically should have better handling than our MSP. However, TO ME, the MSP gives me more confidence to approach the limits. Its probably because Im somewhat of a young novice performance driver in that Ive only had FWD cars. Nonetheless at this point in time TO ME the MSP is a better handler.
Now to the question. I havent driven every car but of those I have driven, the EVO, MSP and ITR are my favorite. The MSP and ITR are really similar in that they are extremely tossable, more tossable than the EVO. In a small very tight parking lot Id take these 2 cars before a EVO. This is attributed to their sub 3000 lb weight whereas a EVO is about 3300 lbs. In the automotive world 500+ lbs is significant.
The AWD EVO doesnt have the torque steer around corners like the FWD cars and to me has a stiffer chasis than the MSP, altho not by much. In a competition situation Id take the EVO no doubt, but for extremely twisty roads Id take the MSP/ITR.
I have a simple test for if a car is a true performace handler. If it can make me say: Holy Sh!t when I drive it thru the twisties than it passes the test. Both the MSP and EVO passed that test.
