MS3 v2 Mustang GT

Bakrauf said:
All i ever owned up till now has been Fords and Mustangs. I love that new body style. But I have 2 kids and need four doors and more space for thier toys..lol. Mustangs around here start at 30,000. So for me it was a no brainer, Pay 21,000 for a MS3 or $10,000 more for a mustang.

Plus you see a mustang every five minutes now.

Is the mustang turning into a chick car? THe last 50 i have seen were all driven by women.

LOL@chick car.
 
MS3Chik said:
ford mustang msrp $27,620

Thats for the GT Premium. I am going the GT deluxe with the $100 3.55 limited slip ratio. $26,440 msrp. A-Plan is ~10%+ under sticker. This puts me around the $24k mark (or less) which is where the MS3 GT is at.

Listen, I know they're apples to oranges. 4 doors is nice, but I don't need it. The trunk is very roomy. I've been in both cars and they are both guilty of cheap interiors IMO. I will say the stang's seats can't compare to the MS3... I've got my Wrangler for the winters. Just kicking some conversation around. I understand its whatever I want, but the fact is I've never owned a sports car before so I end up comparing 4cyl turbos to 8cyl muscle cars. All I have to go by is cost and styling/comfort I like. The rest I look to forums like this to get opinions on the other pros and cons.
 
Decide if your gonna mod it or not... not 1000$ mods, they will be on par.

for more $$ prolly the stang is better especially for drag racing.

I drove a 2006 stang gt auto and now i own a ms3 and i dont think one is much faster than the other stock vs stock... feeling and sound on wot is a ++ on the stang, but i dont think they can handle the same way. The MS3 is more a daly driver than the stang imo.

as said before its apple to orange, choose and be happy

good luck!

p.s.:speaking of broken motor mount, have someone else ever experienced bent frame with a stock stang? ;)
 
Last edited:
matsuda said:
Let's see how Ford and Mazda really compare:

http://www.jdpower.com/autos/brand-ratings/

Just for fun, try comparing Mazda and Kia.


I took a jd power survey so I've seen the questions first hand. I'll just say that I have a little less confidence in them now. IMO it should be taken with a shovel of salt.

Anyway I agree, Ford is a good company and makes good products despite their tarnished reputation and yes Ford has a big influence on Mazda as do Mazda on Ford. Right now, they need each other more than anyone thinks. My biggest problem with Ford is their designs. Except for the mustangs, and their really hign-end sports cars, there really isn't anything else I'd consider pleasing to the eye. My sister has an 1997 v6 mustang with around 60k miles and it runs like a charm. She takes good care of it though.

To the OP: It really comes down to what you really want. Both are fast in a straight line however the Mustang has the edge and a lot more potential. The ms3 isn't the easiest to launch whereas the Mustang is a breeze considering it's rear wheel drive. Practicality goes to the ms3 though but the Mustang has more of a sports car image. Either one will serve you well imo.
 
Last edited:
Bakrauf said:
All i ever owned up till now has been Fords and Mustangs. I love that new body style. But I have 2 kids and need four doors and more space for thier toys..lol. Mustangs around here start at 30,000. So for me it was a no brainer, Pay 21,000 for a MS3 or $10,000 more for a mustang.

Plus you see a mustang every five minutes now.

Is the mustang turning into a chick car? THe last 50 i have seen were all driven by women.

Mustang = Normal Dudes

MS3 = "Nerds with money" and Metrosexuals.
 
mustangs now a days are for late teen to mid 20s women, and middle aged men who still think their cool
 
TheDutchGun said:
Mustang = Normal Dudes

MS3 = "Nerds with money" and Metrosexuals.



I was going to throw the flag here and realized...Oh yeah. haha. (I don't have gel in my hair if that clues you into which one I am)
 
I drove one of the new mustangs and found the cabin to be completely claustrophobic. Very minimal view of the road, and it felt like I was sitting in a tub with how high the belt-line was. Not fun to drive at all.
 
kobaq7 said:
mustangs now a days are for late teen to mid 20s women, and middle aged men who still think their cool
they always were weren't they? wasn't it carol shelby who called it a secretary's car? plus the MS3 is a station wagon so i don't think there's much of an argument in this arena


Pfft said:
Listen, I know they're apples to oranges. 4 doors is nice, but I don't need it. The trunk is very roomy. I've been in both cars and they are both guilty of cheap interiors IMO. I will say the stang's seats can't compare to the MS3... I've got my Wrangler for the winters. Just kicking some conversation around. I understand its whatever I want, but the fact is I've never owned a sports car before so I end up comparing 4cyl turbos to 8cyl muscle cars. All I have to go by is cost and styling/comfort I like. The rest I look to forums like this to get opinions on the other pros and cons.
given that, get the stang. also fwd + power isn't anywhere near as much fun as rwd + power
 
You better compare the insurance rates between the two. I hear the Mustang can get ugly depending on your driving record.
 
That's true with any car; insurance premium is heavily influenced by individual driver record and claim history. Mustang GT has a higher MSRP than the MS3, so that would explain the difference driving records being equal.

I don't know about secretary cars or wagons. But either one wouldn't be a bad choice really when you think about it. They'll both be fun to drive in their own ways. Similar horsepower and torque numbers but different platforms.

I've enjoyed my Mustang for 19 years. Having boost is fun too!
 
TheDutchGun said:
Thats a pretty negative attitude. So what happens if you get an extended warranty then? Does the car wait to break down?

LOL. Yes thats exactly what happens.

Someone said something about ford owning mazda, my own theory on this is that the likes of ford and GM buy a controlling stake in other manufactures as they are struggling to compete, they end up buying the skills of many very talented and diverse engineers and designers. If they cant beat them just buy them out, there are some poor US cars but they do it deliberately, not because they cant.

Many American consumers look upon a vehicle purchase differently than people from other nations, here everything is disposable and driving style is generally different which i think is why the products are not as good here-European focus V's USA focus for example.

All that being said its just my personnel opinion and so is this- Buy the Mazda.
 
matsuda said:
Kind of like a S2000, eh?

Actually, you can put a lot of stuff in the rear of a Mustang. Yes, the hatch really opens.


So are you saying a 2-door Mustang coupe is as practical as the MS3?

Most likely you are saying they are "close-enough"....maybe that's true for *you*....but I'm willing to wager the vast majority of the car buying public would think you are nuts.

I always get a kick out of peope that ignore (or minimize) the practical aspect of car purchases. If you carry that to it's conclusion....just go get a liter sportbike and end this consersation here and now.
(idhitit)
 
RogRacer said:
So are you saying a 2-door Mustang coupe is as practical as the MS3?

Most likely you are saying they are "close-enough"....maybe that's true for *you*....but I'm willing to wager the vast majority of the car buying public would think you are nuts.

I always get a kick out of peope that ignore (or minimize) the practical aspect of car purchases. If you carry that to it's conclusion....just go get a liter sportbike and end this consersation here and now.
(idhitit)


The fox body hatches were more practical than anything from 94 on up, but they still dont have 4 doors and the back seats are useless. My friend thats 6'2 " drove my GT yesterday and his knees were in the dash board with his seat all the way back. (granted the 05's have more room) The Mazda has a lot more room, even being a smaller car.
 
Back