Miller Cycle

Brian MP5T

Banned
Contributor
:
MP5T / 944
miller-beer.jpg


Unfortunately... NO! This is a crappy thing that I post here as An FYI. It's how the engine in the Mazda millenia is made and I found it interesting.

0179_7mg.jpg


Here are some Copy Paste Items for anyone who was interested. I would write it myself, but I'm Lazy and this is very detailed.. I started to look into the miller cycle because it's the engine type I got my Porsche Supercharger from..


99-mazda-miller-01.jpg


When the displacement of an engine is reduced, there is a substantial reduction in frictional losses. For example, 25 percent less friction is produced rotating a particular engine that has its displacement reduced by 30 percent. An automatic offshoot of such downsizing is an improvement in fuel efficiency of around 10-15 percent.

Theoretical vs Actual Compression Ratio
The theoretical compression ratio is simply a comparison of the volume above the piston when it is at bottom dead centre (BDC), to the volume above it at top dead centre (TDC). However, in practice, the actual compression ratio is determined by the valve timing, since the real compression stroke does not begin until the intake valve closes. Similarly, the length of the power (expansion) stroke is also determined by the opening point of the exhaust valve.

With the fairly symmetrical valve timing being found in most engines these days, these two strokes are approximately the same. This means that the actual compression stroke is roughly equal to the expansion stroke.

Thermal Efficiency
By increasing the compression ratio, the thermal efficiency of an engine is also increased. However, along with this efficiency gain comes higher combustion pressures and temperatures. These characteristics are usually accompanied by two well known "bad guys" Oxide of Nitrogen (NOx) emissions and knock.

Pumping Losses
This refers to the energy required to rotate an engine during two of the three non-power producing strokes - pumping air in and pumping exhaust gases out (but does not include frictional losses). It is a term that describes the efficiency of intaking and exhausting the charge. If the piston does less work in taking and exhausting, less power robbing pumping losses are produced.
One of the reason the original Otto-cycle had the exhaust valve opening brought forward (before BDC) is to allow the residual exhaust gas pressure (which, once the piston is half way down the power stroke is too low to provide much push on the piston) to expel itself and not have to rely on the piston to pump it all out, creating further pumping loss. This modified (Otto) valve timing allows around 50 percent of the exhaust gases to be expelled "for free" (no pumping losses incurred in getting rid of half of the exhaust gas). A throttled engine (eg cruising with high manifold vacuum) has high pumping losses since a vacuum is not produced for free; energy is consumed in doing so. Some experimental variable displacement engines reduce the number of working cylinders (switching some off by holding the valves open) under partload to reduce manifold vacuum and therefore pumping losses.

Volumetric Efficiency
The term volumetric efficiency refers to the ability of an engine to fill its cylinders with a volume of air equal to their displacement (100 percent Ve). The greater the Ve then the greater will be the output of that engine. Engine manufacturers go to great lengths to "tune" their engine design and obtain the greatest Ve. This involves a lot of research into gas flow - including manifold and port design - as well as valve timing and lift, together with multiple valves and combustion chamber design.
The easiest way to make dramatic improvements in Ve is to add an external device such as a supercharger or turbocharger. Its job is to "force feed" as much air as possible into each cylinder. But, as with increased compression ratio, excessively high combustion pressures and temperatures may be produced by forced induction. These can work against our intent to produce a powerful but clean engine.
The most common method to overcome this problem is to use an intercooler (as well as lowering the compression ratio). An intercooler is an air-to-air heat exchanger that has the ability to reduce air intake temperature (after the supercharger) by at least 50 deg C. This helps keep combustion temperatures to a safe level.
The modern internal combustion engine is a finely balanced mixture of all these (and many more) conflicting requirements.

Miller-cycle Technical Details


There are basically four means that the Miller-cycle uses to obtain its increased efficiency.
� Smaller engine (lower displacement)
� reduced compression stroke and pumping losses
(from late closing of the intake valve)
� cooler intake charge (intercooled air)
� combustion improvements

An engine that has a lower compression ratio will also naturally produce smaller amounts of friction, particularly on the compression stroke. Since the Miler engine is targeted at a vehicle that would normally use an engine over 3.0L, the reduction in size to 2.3L provides an improvement in fuel efficiency of around 13 percent.

Reduced Compression Stroke Retaining High Expansion Stroke
At first glance the compression ratio would appear to be 10:1 (swept volume compared to clearance volume), however, for the first 20 percent of the compression stroke, the intake valves remain open. Since the actual compression stroke does not begin until the valve closes, the compression ratio is "artificially" reduced down to 8:1.

Intake valve duration is from two degrees before TDC until 70 degrees after BDC, while the exhaust valve duration is from 47 degrees before BDC to five degrees after TDC. The intake valves remain open for around an additional 30 degrees of crankshaft rotation beyond "normal". This kind of valve timing reduces the effective compression ratio from 10:1 to a little under 8:1.

Unusual is the fact that the compression stroke is reduced but the power or expansion stroke remains the same. This is one of the critical points of difference from the Otto-cycle engine where the relationship between the expansion and compression is the same.

The late closing of the intake valve eliminates the substantial amount of energy normally required to overcome friction (as well as pumping losses), in the process of completing a normal compression stroke.
While this sounds good in theory, the usual result of blowing half the intake charge back out the intake valves would be a reduction in volumetric efficiency.

In the Miller-cycle engine, however, this is where the compressor comes to the rescue. Any loss of intake charge through "back flow" is more than compensated for by the density of the charge provided by the compressor. Under these circumstances, the Lysholm compressor is more efficient (lower pumping loss) at carrying out the job of filling the cylinders than a reciprocating piston.

The highly efficient Lysholm Compressor consists of a male and female rotor, with three and five lobes respectively. Rotor speeds are up to 35,000rpm for the male and 21,000rpm for the female. Maximum discharge pressure is up to 150kPA. Advantages of the belt driven compressor include no lag, non-contacting rotors and none of the temperature extremes associated with turbocharger operation.
Cool Intake Charge

Due to the late closing of the intake valves (reduced compression ratio), less heat is added to the intake charge by the piston during this stroke. The loss in thermal efficiency of reduced compression ratio from 10 to 8:1 is only about six percent.

The end result of this delicate balance of valve timing, compression ratio and forced induction, is a cylinder that is well filled with cool dense air but at a lower cost in terms of energy consumption than a conventional four cycle would allow.

Combustion Improvements
For many years, swirl and squish were commonly used terms to describe the in-cylinder events affecting the rate and other characteristics of combustion. In more recent years, extensive study of vertical in-cylinder swirl, called "tumble" has been carried out.
On the Miller engine, the intake port has been shortened to promote smooth but strong intake air flow. A mask is added to the intake side of the combustion chamber to concentrate the air flow to the centre of the cylinder; strengthening the tumble motion.
Tumble promotes more ideal intake dynamics and combustion events that enhances the anti-knocking performance of the engine.
Conclusion

This engine utilises well proven conventional technology, but further enhances it to take into account growing international concerns for the environment and resource preservation.
While, in the fullness of time, engines which use alternative forms of energy may come to pass, Miller-cycle technology will be seen to have advanced the cause of efficiency and responsibility.
 
Last edited:
It was only used in one car, the Millenia S. And while it was innovative, it was horrible in every other way. To change the rear 3 spark plugs you have to dissassemble a good deal of the supercharger pipework and it takes forever to get regular maintence done. For a car that only made 210hp, MNAO should have just imported the KLZE and been done.
 
Nice pics....

I use to have a website dedicated to the Mazda K-series motors with a section on the Miller Cycle. It's a very interesting motor, but seems kinda stupid overall. It's like two steps forward and one step back. Making one area better by making another area worse is kinda dumb.
 
HorsepowerFreak said:
Nice pics....

I use to have a website dedicated to the Mazda K-series motors with a section on the Miller Cycle. It's a very interesting motor, but seems kinda stupid overall. It's like two steps forward and one step back. Making one area better by making another area worse is kinda dumb.

How much technical information do you have on the Millenia?
 
Brian MP5T said:
How much technical information do you have on the Millenia?

I'd have to dig to see what I have still. That was 3 computers ago. :)

I have a little pamphlet I can scan. I've got a rod/piston from the Miller Cycle that's painted and in my bathroom for decor. :)
 
MazKid said:
It was only used in one car, the Millenia S. And while it was innovative, it was horrible in every other way. To change the rear 3 spark plugs you have to dissassemble a good deal of the supercharger pipework and it takes forever to get regular maintence done. For a car that only made 210hp, MNAO should have just imported the KLZE and been done.

But at least Mazda was willing to take a "risk" with bringing such an engine to market. Can't say that much for any other manufacturer.
 
Dimitrios said:
But at least Mazda was willing to take a "risk" with bringing such an engine to market. Can't say that much for any other manufacturer.

I'd say the rotary was even ballsier. :) Especially to bring it back!
 
MazKid said:
It was only used in one car, the Millenia S. And while it was innovative, it was horrible in every other way.

In EVERY other way ??? bet it was more fuel efficient than a KL-ZE.....this was the main idea on the MILLER cycle..BIG V6 power, small 4 cylinder consumption....

I agree the maintenance is rediculous...
 
HorsepowerFreak said:
I'd say the rotary was even ballsier. :) Especially to bring it back!

It barely left..keep in mind the RX-7 continued in production WELL after it left north america
 
TampaSport20 said:
It barely left..keep in mind the RX-7 continued in production WELL after it left north america

Well yeah... the FD had some horrible design flaws... In this country at least. This gave it kind of a bad name for many people.


What I meant was to introduce that engine in the first place (early 70's I think). Took some guts to release such a thing. If it worked/sold well or not, it's still a radical design compared to what this world is use to when it comes to automotive engines.
 
HorsepowerFreak said:
Well yeah... the FD had some horrible design flaws... In this country at least. This gave it kind of a bad name for many people.

Don't say that (hah) ..."what's his face" will come on this thread and read you the riot act about how reliable FD's are, and then say 100,000 miles on a stock engine before a full rebuild is reliable
 
Hey... I by no means will knock the rotary. I'm just speaking in realistic terms. You don't take care of an FD, you will go through engines. The CAN be reliable, but there's a price to pay for them to be that way.... Maintenance. Most people don't like to maintain cars on a high level, myself included.

My FC TII has a hair under 200k on the ORIGINAL engine. :) I was even racing it w/ that kind of mileage.
 
HorsepowerFreak said:
Hey... I by no means will knock the rotary. I'm just speaking in realistic terms. You don't take care of an FD, you will go through engines. The CAN be reliable, but there's a price to pay for them to be that way.... Maintenance. Most people don't like to maintain cars on a high level, myself included.

My FC TII has a hair under 200k on the ORIGINAL engine. :) I was even racing it w/ that kind of mileage.

From everything I have read FC>FD as far as longevity....My FC was NA, but it had like 175K on the clock before I had to get rid of it
 
Yeah, the FC's are much more reliable... the cooling, emissions, wiring, etc were part of the "horrible design flaws" I was speaking of.

Amazing cars and I love them to death... but they have their weak points.


As for rotary reliability... they can last just as long, if not longer than a standard piston engine. The engine isn't necessarily the unreliable part of those cars (FD).
 
Last edited:
Interesting Power from the rotary for displacement, but s*** fuel Economy.. I guess that's why it went into a sprots car and not a City Bus.
 
Brian MP5T said:
Interesting Power from the rotary for displacement, but s*** fuel Economy.. I guess that's why it went into a sprots car and not a City Bus.

that and no ******* torque
 

New Threads

Back