twilightprotege
Member
- :
- 2001 323 Astina SP20 (P5)
hey...first of all sorry for going all over the place with this, but it's been bugging me for ages...
well I'd like to get some real answers on this because everything i've seen so far doesnt really explain it all to me.
I know the J-spec intake manifold is supposed to be dual runners.
now from the picture on the corksport website it looks the same, and i mean identical to my IM.
first quesion (might make this all much simpler and quicker) - does the J-spec IM have a marking stamped on it (like the camshafts etc)?????
2nd q - since the IM's look identical to me, and assuming the japanese make things in bulk to save costs...how does the VICS operate with the j-spec IM??? see the problem i have is that i'd be 99.999% sure the VICS mechanism works exactly the same as ours...and if that's the case...well...
see if i'm explaining the concept of VICS correctly....pls correct me if i'm wrong.
the idea of VICS is to have long runners at low rpm, short runners at high rpm. right? if that is the case, the VICS butterflys MUST be shut at high rpm (against popular belief i'm sure). if the VICS butterflys were open, air would be coming from as far away as the runner for cylinder 4 when no 1 is on the intake stroke. right? doesnt sound very good when the idea of VICS is to reduce runner length
now this is why i've got the 2nd q - that would mean on the j-spec IM VICS would be closed and...urrr...that would mean the air would be travelling along the longest runner.
maybe does the VICS work opposite on the j-spec IM to allow air to come through the shorter runner???
maybe i'm just confusing myself here, hell i dunno, but it would be good to get this all clarrified...hell maybe us aussies have the j-spec IM and that's why i'm getting confused??????
well I'd like to get some real answers on this because everything i've seen so far doesnt really explain it all to me.
I know the J-spec intake manifold is supposed to be dual runners.
now from the picture on the corksport website it looks the same, and i mean identical to my IM.
first quesion (might make this all much simpler and quicker) - does the J-spec IM have a marking stamped on it (like the camshafts etc)?????
2nd q - since the IM's look identical to me, and assuming the japanese make things in bulk to save costs...how does the VICS operate with the j-spec IM??? see the problem i have is that i'd be 99.999% sure the VICS mechanism works exactly the same as ours...and if that's the case...well...
see if i'm explaining the concept of VICS correctly....pls correct me if i'm wrong.
the idea of VICS is to have long runners at low rpm, short runners at high rpm. right? if that is the case, the VICS butterflys MUST be shut at high rpm (against popular belief i'm sure). if the VICS butterflys were open, air would be coming from as far away as the runner for cylinder 4 when no 1 is on the intake stroke. right? doesnt sound very good when the idea of VICS is to reduce runner length
now this is why i've got the 2nd q - that would mean on the j-spec IM VICS would be closed and...urrr...that would mean the air would be travelling along the longest runner.
maybe does the VICS work opposite on the j-spec IM to allow air to come through the shorter runner???
maybe i'm just confusing myself here, hell i dunno, but it would be good to get this all clarrified...hell maybe us aussies have the j-spec IM and that's why i'm getting confused??????