I was working in our windtunnel today when I was starring at the flow straighteners at the inlet of the wind tunnel... and started thinking about the flow straighteners on my COBB intake. I started gettin' to thinking if I could improve on the current flow straighteners by using a honeycomb flow straightener. Now I'm not necessarily talking about gaining more HP with this change but really achieving more consistency in the cars performance.
I was thinking after reading some other threads on here about how the MAF sensor is really sensitive to the air rushing past it if I could smooth out the turbulence past the sensor. The idea of using some of the honeycomb flow straighteners is essentially allowing the MAF to get more consistent & accurate reading thus helping the car. When we were building our wind tunnel the tunnel would obviously operate without the flow straighteners but with them it eliminated noise in the mass flow.
What I plan on doing is cutting two circles and stacking them upstream of the current flow straighteners. We have the 1'' thick sections and 3'' thick sections which I think will be too long.
I am a little concerned about heat soak and the honeycomb melting esp when the engine is turned off ...
I was thinking after reading some other threads on here about how the MAF sensor is really sensitive to the air rushing past it if I could smooth out the turbulence past the sensor. The idea of using some of the honeycomb flow straighteners is essentially allowing the MAF to get more consistent & accurate reading thus helping the car. When we were building our wind tunnel the tunnel would obviously operate without the flow straighteners but with them it eliminated noise in the mass flow.
What I plan on doing is cutting two circles and stacking them upstream of the current flow straighteners. We have the 1'' thick sections and 3'' thick sections which I think will be too long.
I am a little concerned about heat soak and the honeycomb melting esp when the engine is turned off ...