Ghosts or something wierd??
- Thread starter AndrewF150
- Start date
AndrewF150
Member
It wasn't even lense glare! It looked like someone got make-up on the lense...or even like peanut butter oil or some s***!
Damn people getting me all excited about some weird ghost s***...than it turns out to be food or something!
Damn people getting me all excited about some weird ghost s***...than it turns out to be food or something!
pip7441622
Member
- :
- Mazdaspeed Protege
A lot like sex eh?! ba-da-bing!protejay5 said:
haha ok, no.
- :
- 2018 CX-5 GT
Hey, at least it spawned an interesting thread. (shrug) I've enjoyed the posts so far. Thanks for replying, btw, Lara & Shane. I'm still freaked out in our house tho, lol.
Roywhitep5
Member
- :
- 2007 350z
that 2nd one is freaky
Snacks McGee
Member
- :
- 2003 Vivid Yellow P5
Powells85 said:
Pics!!!
http://www.bridgeoflove.com/bookstore/icke/magazine/vol14/articles/surfing-4.html
Missile_Man
Member
Wow, I did something exactly like That with photo shop. Just take the pic of someone, fade it from the top in the direction that you want to see of the "ghost", reduce the opacity down to like 5-8% put it into the other pic, lower the resolution so you really cant make out details and voialla! You have a ghost picture. And vidios, all though a bit harder, You do esentially the same thing.
If you are rally good a developing photos, you can print the picture, dont set it though, then burn in a small part of the other photo giving you a ghost.
Or the even harder way, (this way usually makes he pictures look either really really dark or really really bright in contrast because of the exposure.) Take a picture, but it must be under exposed, DONT ADVANCE THE FILM (this only works on old fasiond cameras where you advance the film by a lever.) Take a picture of a person but it has to be really really underexposed so that the whole picture doesnt turn out a white blob. Develop the negative, print it, and you will have a "ghost" in the picture.
I'm sorry to sound like a nerd (even though i am one) But there are no true ghost pictures. Case closed. Now-adays you can minipulate anyone into beleiveing just about anything.
Oh BTW, I'm a woman mwahahahahahaha
HA bet you beleived that lol.
If you are rally good a developing photos, you can print the picture, dont set it though, then burn in a small part of the other photo giving you a ghost.
Or the even harder way, (this way usually makes he pictures look either really really dark or really really bright in contrast because of the exposure.) Take a picture, but it must be under exposed, DONT ADVANCE THE FILM (this only works on old fasiond cameras where you advance the film by a lever.) Take a picture of a person but it has to be really really underexposed so that the whole picture doesnt turn out a white blob. Develop the negative, print it, and you will have a "ghost" in the picture.
I'm sorry to sound like a nerd (even though i am one) But there are no true ghost pictures. Case closed. Now-adays you can minipulate anyone into beleiveing just about anything.
Oh BTW, I'm a woman mwahahahahahaha
HA bet you beleived that lol.
Snacks McGee
Member
- :
- 2003 Vivid Yellow P5
Missile_Man said:
Now was that really necessary??? (smash)
