Fast And Furious 3?...why!

Replica said:
The second one was terrible. How does a Cobra R and a Z06 lose to a V6 Eclipse on the highway?
easy, no graphics no self respect no chance, also he didn't have naws, naws doesn't even need to be running or hooked up to make your car go fast as long as there is a tank in your trunk or seat
 
Granted both weren't great, and they are a far cry from reality, you have to give Hollywood some credit. I wouldn't mind seeing a well done movie with some imports. Gone in 60 seconds was good. Had it not been for the sucess of the first fast and Furious we might not have see that remake. But yes F&F sucked. I liked seeing that Mustang being destroyed though.
 
silverturbozoom said:
i was goofin around at Yahoo! and typed in Fast and Furious 3....
and this link popped up!

WHAT ANOTHER DAMN RICEr MOVIE!(pissed) ...please people....cant you get a hint....one movie was bad enough

and this one is gonna follow Vin Diesel's character and supposed to take place in Tokyo!.....

http://movies.yahoo.com/shop?d=hp&cf=prev&id=1808497482&intl=us

your thoughts

actually this sounds pretty good, if its held in tokyo with the yakuza! besides, paul walker isn't in it which is a big plus!
 
Protege2ner said:
Granted both weren't great, and they are a far cry from reality, you have to give Hollywood some credit. I wouldn't mind seeing a well done movie with some imports. Gone in 60 seconds was good. Had it not been for the sucess of the first fast and Furious we might not have see that remake. But yes F&F sucked. I liked seeing that Mustang being destroyed though.
that was the best part, me and my boys actually got up in the theatre and gave that a standing ovation, it actually caused a ripple effect and others did it as well!
Kris
 
i dont mind, but it said it takes place in tokyo. which makes me wanna see it...if they put a jdm protege in there..i wont think twice :D
 
if they put a JDM protege up there, im putting for sale signs on my car... mainly cause thats when ill get top dollar! lol and i dont wantpeople calling my car a "fast and the furious" car which it has already been called
Kris
 
SpicyMchaggis said:
**** all those cars in 2f2f...that M3-GTR should of been the star..
sorry to break it to you, but that in no way was an M3 let alone a GTR. I am a big BMW buff and that was an e36(92-99) 3 series with a tacky body kit and stock suspension ride height. I actually found the list later on, i found it was a 98 323is (smallest engine bmw made that year) on top of that it was an automatic, all it had was some tacky wheels, and a cheezy fiberglass kit. I love BMWs and i will go back to one after the MSP, but i dont care much at all for that one... just my .02
kris
 
i find that interesting. moreover, i'd like to see this list..I've never really paid attention during that movie, and that is a GTR-style body kit. It is an E36, and there were E36 GTR converts..I'm not going to argue with you, i'm just suprised. Also in a mag after the movie, it was listed as a M3-GTR.
 
well, the GTR is pretty much a complete car, they do everything from sick looks, with a v8 motor(that might just be e46), and SICK suspension work, that car was just a 323is with a kit and wheels, honestly i dont even thing that particular gtr kit was that nice, the e46 is beautiful, ill see if i can find the link
 
Hot-N-Bustee said:
omg....2 much 2 funny!!

The sequel to Biker Boys should be: 2 Baby's 2 Daddy.


"V8's are slow and ghey on July 24th"!! very funny!


Hot-n-bustee huh? Hmmm...

(scratch)
 
I want to see it just to see how is going to be the leading lady(lick)
 
Yeah, it was nice..My friend just picked up a '99 323i..Has that slow 2.5 V6..A real snoozer. My DX is just as fast. I've seen a couple E36 M3-GTR's..they used tuned 3.0's..The E46 was the V8..Although, there was no set in stone GTR version of the E36, there are variations..the E46 is the hot ******* ish.
 
Am I one of the few that didn't mind these 2 movies? I enjoyed the first 1, for some reason I had a real hard on for the Supra
The sequel was only good cuz of Tyrese and his lines. He had me in stitches
 
jersey_emt said:
:wtf:

First one was watchable (and funny!!)
Second one just sucked.
The first one was dumb, but fun if you didn't take it seriously.

The second one was actually insulting. There was too much suspension of disbelief required for that movie to actually work.
 
Back