enough power?

[fraochdha]

Hey ya'll.

Sorry to sound like an ignorant tool, but. I've read a few posts on other sites as well, that question the "power" of the CX-9, and that you have to literally "Floor It" when trying to merge onto the freeway. I understand that the 08 has more HP than the 07, and that the AWD is a lil heavier than the base model. And here's my questions for all you cx-9 owners...

Do you feel that it has enough power?

Have any of you tried both AWD and FD models? and have you noticed a difference in power and output?

And lastly, are there power mods that can be done without jacking with the man's warantee?

Thanks

P.

 

[CX-7owner]

We just got an 08 FWD Rental, and it is damn smooth and powerful, you really don't know you're building up speed until you look at the speedo, I Imagine the AWD won't make much of a difference since my CX-7 has the same system, and the FWD/AWD difference in acceleration is negligible. Like with any slushbox in drive, you need to give it throttle to move, all of your questions will be answered in a test drive.

 

[TinMan]

I find it has plenty (08). It isn't an RX-8, but it isn't a minivan either...
To clarify: When I say minivan, I also include the Honda Pilot.

 

[rk2112]

Hey ya'll.

Sorry to sound like an ignorant tool, but. I've read a few posts on other sites as well, that question the "power" of the CX-9, and that you have to literally "Floor It" when trying to merge onto the freeway. I understand that the 08 has more HP than the 07, and that the AWD is a lil heavier than the base model. And here's my questions for all you cx-9 owners...

Do you feel that it has enough power?

Have any of you tried both AWD and FD models? and have you noticed a difference in power and output?

And lastly, are there power mods that can be done without jacking with the man's warantee?

Thanks

P.

Here is a paragraph from the Motor Trend SUV of the year article:

"As amusing as a movie is on the go, though, avoid the second and third rows and opt for the driver's seat-the chair of choice. From here, the controls that count are at your beck and call, ready to react with the utmost responsiveness. Sink your spur into the well-calibrated electronic throttle, and the new-for-2008 3.7-liter V-6 shakes the reins on 273 horsepower, a 10-horse boost over the previous 3.5-liter. (If you're wondering why the CX-9 didn't play last year, the 2007 model went on sale after our cut-off date.) More important, torque has risen from 249 to 270 pound-feet, and, at 4250, is now realized 150 rpm earlier. While we still wouldn't mind a tad more low-end grunt, the 3.7 nonetheless behaves in a silky, refined manner, accentuated by a sporty growl from the dual exhaust. Mated to an Aisin six-speed automatic that's as seamless as a rubber glove, the Japan-built Ford-based V-6 scoots the CX-9 from 0 to 60 in 7.8 seconds and through the quarter mile in 16.0 flat at 87.8 mph, placing it ahead of every three-row midsize crossover in this year's field sans the sprightlier Highlander, which recorded 7.3 and 15.7 at 87.7."

 

[fraochdha]

Thank you all.

P.

 

[CX9 SportOwner]

our '07 is a rocket. FWD so I can easily break the front tires loose if I want to. And being a little faster doesnt make up for the new Highlander being a turd.

 

[AZ-CX9]

Plenty of power. I think the reason that this issues gets mentioned at all is due to the fact that auto downshifts require a little more push on the accelerator then I'm used to. I've gotten used to playing with the sport-shift to get a gear lower then the "system" wants to give me...

 

[P5w3kids]

In forums I've read complaints about the amount of power in a Porsche Cayman S. Despite huge increases in horsepower over the last 20 years, many people continue to have irrational expectations in terms of acceleration.

Sorry, but instantaneous 0-60 isn't going to happen. It's going to continue to be necessary to look over one's left shoulder when merging on to the freeway, and to wait for a gap in traffic when turning on to a busy street.

 

[TravelinMan]

The concept of power or quickness of a car is more a question of the engine torque (and when it's available) than its horsepower. For instance, I have a Nissan Sentra Spec R that has about 170hp and it's 0-60 time is only about a 1/2 sec fast than the CX-9. But because it's a big 4cyl (2.5L) with a lot of torque at low rpms, it jumps and "feels" much faster. I've also owned a Prius that was a slug from 0-60 but from 0-30 it was as fast as any 6cyl sedan because the electric engine provided the initial power (all 70hp) and the torque (very high) is instantaneous from an electric motor. I only have about 1200 miles on my CX-9 so I have not really pressed it yet, but it does feel like their is plenty of acceleration when needed.

 

[fraochdha]

Well I went down to the dealer today and test drove two cx-9's. A Grand Touring with AWD and a Sport with FWD. The Sport undoubtable seemed faster, probably because it didn't have the extra weight that the Gtrouring did, but it did have-- what seemed to be-- a lot fo wheel torque when stomping on the pedal, of which the AWD didn't have at all. I'm impressed with both, but will probably end up getting the AWD GTouring.

Thanks ya'll.

 

[IanKen]

The answer to this question is always "no."

Always. More power: must have it.

This thing can go faster. Quicker. Stronger. We have the technology.

 

[fraochdha]

Just Bought

Well Finally did it. It's a couple weeks old, but I landed me an '08 cx-9 GTA, RSES, NAV, with roof rack and AWD options.

I'm digging it. Plenty o power, though the mileage definitely takes a toll with the AWD and my lead foot. But I do dig this ride!!!

 

[CX-7owner]

Yeah, the AWD works with how much throttle you giving it, so try not to floor it and you should be OK.

It also works with how many G forces you are pulling, as well as driving conditions/engine status.

 

[CX_9]

i find it has plenty (08). It isn't an rx-8, but it isn't a minivan either...
To clarify: When i say minivan, i also include the honda pilot.

lol

 

[ftp19601960]

I remember that Mazda says ECU has ‘Active Adaptive Shift mode’. Conditions are “The accelerator pedal is depressed fully to accelerate rapidly while driving in D position” and “Rapid acceleration or deceleration continues for a certain period of time while driving in D position”. In this AAS mode AT shift point and TCC point settings are higher. So it’s not linear. To quickly accelerate, floor the gas or it’s still NORMAL or probably ECONOMY mode.

 

[riptide]

I remember that Mazda says ECU has ‘Active Adaptive Shift mode’. Conditions are “The accelerator pedal is depressed fully to accelerate rapidly while driving in D position” and “Rapid acceleration or deceleration continues for a certain period of time while driving in D position”. In this AAS mode AT shift point and TCC point settings are higher. So it’s not linear. To quickly accelerate, floor the gas or it’s still NORMAL or probably ECONOMY mode.

Good response.. I've noticed this on my own CX-9. I own a CX-7 and CX-9 and what you say makes a lot of sense. My CX-7 (GT) is a freak'n rocket however, my CX-9 does have to be floored when in D position to get up and go....which I like because the little beast is much better on gas than my Ford Explorer....

 

[robertof]

Has anyone considered this?
http://cordovamotorsports.com/cgi-bin/CMS/shop_mastr
http://cordovamotorsports.com/New37L-TB.html

The mazda6 guys both 3.0 and 3.7 guys are running them and have seen increase in power and improved throttle response without any idle issues or CEL.

before
http://sdbhost.com/images/CMS/TB37-Before-B.jpg


After
http://sdbhost.com/images/CMS/TB37-After-B.jpg