Driving Impressions:2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed 6 (A/W)

mikeyb

Member
Contributor
:
01 BMW 325xi Touring
Speed Without the Garish Wing: MazdaSpeed 6 offers stealth performance in a practical sedan

msp61.jpg


2006 MAZDA MAZDASPEED 6
ON SALE: Now
BASE PRICE: $28,555
POWERTRAIN: 2.3-liter, 274-hp, 280-lb-ft turbocharged I4; awd, six-speed manual
CURB WEIGHT: 3589 lbs
0 TO 60 MPH: 6.2 seconds (mfr.)
FUEL MILAGE (EPA COMBINED): 22.7 mpg


Plenty of four-door sedans out there go fast and are priced reasonably, but all too often they come with a big wing on the back and a monster air-slurping hood scoop. Your teenager thinks the hood scoop looks fly. You think youd have to wear a disguise while driving it. So is there anything available for the performance-loving sedan piloto that comes with a more businesslike exterior?

Consider the Mazda MazdaSpeed 6. It offers the practicality of a Toyota Camry with the acceleration and handling of a tuner car. That could be because it is something of a tuner car, though without the NOPI Nationals look.

We first drove and wrote about the MazdaSpeed 6 just over a year ago (Deep Six, Dec. 20, 2004), and you and we have been waiting ever since to get behind the wheel of a production version. Well, after delays caused by Mazdas quixotic search for the perfect final drive ratio, the cars are here. Was it worth the wait? Yes, of course.

msp62.jpg


When we said tuner car, we meant tuner car made by a squadron of Japanese engineers, not the typical hand grenade sometimes seen in an IDRC/Sony Xplod Battle of the Imports staging lane. To increase horsepower and torque to reasonably powerful levels in the MazdaSpeed 6, Mazda went high tech.

Because the V6 with all the MazdaSpeed stuff wouldnt fit underhood, Mazda engineers brought in the 2.3-liter four. But not just any 2.3-liter four; this one came equipped with direct-injection spark ignition. Try building a direct-injection system using parts from your typical tuner mail-order catalog.

Direct-injection places the fuel injector directly in the combustion chamber instead of farther back in the intake plenum. This allows for cooler operation and more complete burning of the fuel/air mixture. When you add a turbocharger and intercooler to that setup, you have an efficient, fun-to-drive package.

Power and torque pour out in a nice, even arc across the tach. You might expect that in changing from a six- to a four-cylinder you would get everything up at the top of the tach near redline, but this turbo four is remarkable for its low-end torque as much as its high-end horsepower.

That output is routed through another thing you cant get in a catalog and bolt on: Mazdas active torque-split all-wheel drive. With some torque always routed to the rear wheels, the system can split almost all of it in front or an even 50/50 front/rear instantly.

msp63.jpg


The onboard computer chooses one of three modes for the awd: Normal, with most torque going to the front; Sport, with as much as 50 percent going to the rear; and Snow, with the system continuously rerouting torque depending on available grip. A limited-slip rear differential, modified from the RX-8, also helps power distribution.

The MazdaSpeed 6 gets body reinforcements that stiffen the unibody 50 percent. Spring rates are up by 25 percent in front and 37 percent rear, while front and rear antiroll bars are thicker. Brake discs go up to 12.6 inches front and 12.4 inches rear, as well.

And that exterior is nicely subtle in its approach to speediness, with understated front air dam, side skirts and the merest of wings coming out of the decklid.

How is the MazdaSpeed 6 to drive? It has better performance, no doubt about that. The 215/45R tires let you know everything going on underneath them, and the six-speed manual gearbox clicks into each gear like a locking briefcase. Roll control is better and turn-in is considerably sharper.

msp64.jpg


If we were to complain, we would say the suspension lets every bump and wobble into the cabin and up the steering column. Like all midsize sedan makers in the world, Mazda tried at launch to compare its 6 to the BMW 3 Series, but even this MazdaSpeed product aint no 3 Series. BMWs are judicious about what gets through the suspension and into the steering column. This 6 lets it all come in and then leaves you to sort it out.

Still, among the vast swath of Camry/Accord/Fusion/Five Hundred/Malibu/etc. cars that make up the midsize sedan market in America, this is the one to choose if you need a practical four-door but can still recognize a proper apex when you see one.
Four-door flash & dash

If flying above the radar is more your thing, these turbo sedans speak loudly and carry a big stick.

msp65.jpg


2006 SUBARU IMPREZA WRX STI

POWERTRAIN: 2.5-liter turbocharged H4
HORSEPOWER: 300 @ 6000 rpm
TORQUE: 300 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm
CURB WEIGHT: 3351 lbs

msp66.jpg


2006 MITSUBISHI LANCER EVOLUTION MR

POWERTRAIN: 2.0-liter turbocharged I4
HORSEPOWER: 286 @ 6500 rpm
TORQUE: 289 lb-ft @ 3500 rpm
CURB WEIGHT: 3285 lbs

source:http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060123/FREE/60112008/1006/DrivingImpressions
 
seanmcsean said:
I really wish they'd stop comparing it to the evo and sti

where do you think it fits...comparision wise? you know how it's all about comparing it with other "like" vehicles...for reviews and sales stuff
 
100% correct mikey.. that's really the only other vehicle that compares to it.
 
seanmcsean said:
100% correct mikey.. that's really the only other vehicle that compares to it.

Car & Driver, Motortrend, and Spdmag have comparos both these two.
 
Actually, I was looking at the Volvo S60 R before I decided to go with the Speed6. Very comparable. The Volvo adds a cylinder and 25hp, but it's closer to the same size/wieght than the WRX and Evo. And the luxury factor is more equal.
 
So I went to the dealership yesterday for an oil change and decided to take an MSP6 out for a test drive. Here are my impressions...

Interior Impressions:
First off, the all black interior is too plain for me. I would have to get the GT package with the two-tone interior. I'd prefer light-gray to off-white but oh well. The dash is layed out nicely and I could easily replace the factory head unit with an aftermarket one (a must for me). The seats were sporty but not racey. There was plenty of leg room and head room for me at 6'3". I had to move the seat up from the last position and that is usually a good sign. The shift knob felt small and I couldn't throw it around like I can in my Protege5. The knob was also a little low for my taste. I was very disappointed in the trunk. Although it is large, there is no passthrough or folding rear seats. Furthermore there is only a single speaker opening for a subwoofer on the rear deck. If I were to add bass, I'd have to cut out a section of the rear deck for the air to pass through.

Driving impressions:
The clutch was preventing me from having fun. I couldn't get the hang of it. My Protege5 has a very smooth linear motion that requires even pressure throughout its travel. The MSP6 on the contrary was stiff at first and then springy afterward. It made it very difficult to memorize the catch point. It also felt like the arm of the clutch was shorter than my P5. When I pushed it in, felt like I was going up into the dash instead of straight out to the firewall. Maybe its just because the car is new but I don't remember my P5 feeling like that ever. Accelleration was good. It had pickup at all RPMs but it didn't make you feel like you were speeding. The car was very quiet on the inside even in the rain and under accelleration. It wasn't Mercedes or Lexus quiet but it was hard to tell there was a turbo 4 in front of me. I kind of expected an additional 150hp to WOW me but it didn't. The brakes were excellent and I couldn't feel the additional weight of the car However the weight was apparent when quickly changing lanes. The AWD system was transparent. I didn't get to take the car on any twisties but on the moderate turns I took the car handled itself very well. Overall it felt sporty but far from racey.

Conclusion:
Would I buy this car? I did the math and I'd be paying about an extra $200-250/mo to trade in my P5 for a MSP6....so the answer is no I would not buy it...for the price they are asking right now. Its not because it isn't a great car, its because it isn't the car I want right now. I thought that a larger car would be more enjoyable on long trips and the turbo would add some fun to my daily driving but when I drove home from the dealer I realized how much fun my own car is to drive. Sure it's a little small for a 6'3" guy but I manage. I think I would rather drop 3-5K into my Protege5 to improve the performance before I buy another car (as long as it doesn't hurt the reliability)
 
good review chris, you should do this professionaly and get out of the business of selling yourself on the street corner!
 
I make better money on the street.

I don't know, I like the car. If I were to pay that much for a car there isn't another new car on the market I would rather have. However, I just can't see paying that much. Plus, I'd have to lower it and get better wheels, and prolly add some more mods to make the most out of the car.
 
Just about everytime you see a MS6 review, it is ultimately compared to the WRX STi and EVO MR. While the cars are not even aimed at the same audience or for the same purpose, the price comparison should make the editors just about roll over die. Both the STi and MR are $35K+, with all the usual options, while a top of the line MS6 is $32K or $33K tops. That leaves you an extra $2-3K to add into the car after purchase. Everytime I see the comparison, I know not to take that magazine for all that it says.
 
i've gotta take one out for a drive...where did you go chris...for your test drive?
 
Mazda Gallery on Rte1 in Norwood has one in like every color except blue. That's on your way home from work right? Ask for Hershene and tell him I sent you!

I think the reason it is being compared to the tuner cars is because until now Mazdaspeed has been synonamous with the tuner crowd. If they called it something else the critics would probably compare it to different cars....like the ones that are in the same target market.
 
chuyler1 said:
Interior Impressions:I was very disappointed in the trunk. Although it is large, there is no passthrough or folding rear seats.

Although it is not written in the manual, with a few minutes time (check the thread on this topic) the seats DO fold down.


chuyler1 said:
Driving impressions:
The clutch was preventing me from having fun. I couldn't get the hang of it. My Protege5 has a very smooth linear motion that requires even pressure throughout its travel. The MSP6 on the contrary was stiff at first and then springy afterward. It made it very difficult to memorize the catch point. It also felt like the arm of the clutch was shorter than my P5. When I pushed it in, felt like I was going up into the dash instead of straight out to the firewall. Maybe its just because the car is new but I don't remember my P5 feeling like that ever. Accelleration was good. It had pickup at all RPMs but it didn't make you feel like you were speeding. The car was very quiet on the inside even in the rain and under accelleration. It wasn't Mercedes or Lexus quiet but it was hard to tell there was a turbo 4 in front of me. I kind of expected an additional 150hp to WOW me but it didn't.
I love the car, but the electronic clutch is maddening even after 3 months of driving the car. No engagement, no engagement, BAM, clutch engaged. If I take my time driving I've got it mastered now, but if I am in a hurry at all, that clutch is my nemesis...LOL!

As for the power, it is just THERE. It is there RIGHT NOW, and WHENEVER you need it, without much excitement (engine noise-wise) at all. Not to say that this car does not go, but I almost want it to be a bit more noisy when I tromp it. I am looking forward to replacing the exhaust so that I can get more aural feedback when my right foot grows heavy.

R
 
Ord said:
Actually, I was looking at the Volvo S60 R before I decided to go with the Speed6. Very comparable. The Volvo adds a cylinder and 25hp, but it's closer to the same size/wieght than the WRX and Evo. And the luxury factor is more equal.

Great point O. You are the first person I have seen that has stated this, but I was thinking the same thing with respect to the stats of these two cars. Very, very similar indeed.

R
 

New Threads

Back