Hey guys
I am on the verge of buying a Mazda3. Honda no longer makes a product I want to buy for under $20K, but that's another thread...
In testdriving the Mazda3, I noticed that the clutch engages/disengages closer to the floor than other manual vehicles, but this is just something I have to get used to. The main thing I am worried about is the delay built into the electronic throttle. I have no idea why Mazda would do such a thing, but the throttle reacts about a second after I change the throttle pedal input. It is making the car difficult to drive smoothly, especially from a stop, where throttle modulation is rather important. As it is, throttle modulation is pretty pointless due to the delay, and the result is either a bogged engine, or a lot of clutch slippage. After the test drive, I drove off in my Accord and the difference was so dramatic it startled me. The delay made the Mazda 3 feel lethargic and slow in comparison even though it is a much faster car. I think Car and Driver's complaint in this regard echos my observation.
Is there a work around for this design flaw? I've never heard that good throttle response is a bad thing, so why would Mazda engineers, or anyone else for that matter, build in poor throttle response via a electronic delay?
I am on the verge of buying a Mazda3. Honda no longer makes a product I want to buy for under $20K, but that's another thread...
In testdriving the Mazda3, I noticed that the clutch engages/disengages closer to the floor than other manual vehicles, but this is just something I have to get used to. The main thing I am worried about is the delay built into the electronic throttle. I have no idea why Mazda would do such a thing, but the throttle reacts about a second after I change the throttle pedal input. It is making the car difficult to drive smoothly, especially from a stop, where throttle modulation is rather important. As it is, throttle modulation is pretty pointless due to the delay, and the result is either a bogged engine, or a lot of clutch slippage. After the test drive, I drove off in my Accord and the difference was so dramatic it startled me. The delay made the Mazda 3 feel lethargic and slow in comparison even though it is a much faster car. I think Car and Driver's complaint in this regard echos my observation.
Is there a work around for this design flaw? I've never heard that good throttle response is a bad thing, so why would Mazda engineers, or anyone else for that matter, build in poor throttle response via a electronic delay?