Whether a feature is "worth the extra premium" is primarily a function of the buyers financial standing. If the buyer is debt free and has more than adequate investments and savings towards retirement then it's a much easier equation - if you want it, go for it. If, on the other hand, the buyer is working to build an adequate nest egg, the extra cost feature needs to be transformative to be "worth it". Will it make you more productive? Will it substantially change the safety dynamics? Or, is it just a 'want' that can't really be justified with meaningful benefits? If the latter, it's much better to forgo it due to the time value of assets. Asset values compound and grow at an amazing rate when reasonably invested and lost savings in the earlier part of ones career are hard to re-capture later (due to fewer decades with which to compound).
That said, if you live in a northerly climate with long nights and do a lot of night driving on fast, unlit roads, the better headlights may be of substantial benefit. If more driving is urban, low speed driving or on well lit highways, the upgraded headlights will be of little real benefit. If you are an easily distracted driver and have had a couple of at fault collisions, the city brake support is probably a no-brainer. But, if you are normally very attentive with good reflexes and good driving habits, city brake support becomes much less valuable and the decision will likely be a financial one. This is the nature of financial decisions, they are very dependent upon the individuals finances.
