There are many tires under the Michelin 'Pilot' marketing name. Just because the Pilot MXM4's line that is OEM with the N. American Mazda6 sucks doesn't mean the other tires under the 'Pilot' series suck. The 'Pilot' name is all marketing, just like 'Potenza' and 'Eagle' are for Bridgestone and Goodyear respectively - there are some good and no-so-good tire-lines under each of these series.Da 6 said:ok..hold on let me comprehend this...(scratch) You want the same tires we hate? Michelins that increase the understeer of the car. In the V6 model you break traction in 1st and continue to loose it in 2nd till you shift to 3rd. there are gashes in the tread from every day use and sections missing from the tread from 1 autocross session. Michelin pilots aren't a tire you want. Get either summer only tires and rims for the good seasons and get snow on the stock rims. or you could just get a really good rated 4 season tire and say F it (2thumbs) .
Mikey444 is slightly wrong because the Michelin Alpin series is actually a winter tire, but I'm sure he was referring to the Michelin Pilot Sport A/S, which would have been a much better choice for the Mazda3 17's than the Goodyears. However, as goldwing2000 says, it's a business decision (read: $$$ + politics).
To further prove that these are just business decisions, the Mazda3 17's for Euro-spec are Bridgestone Potenza's, and the JDM-spec Mazda3 16-inch is actually a Michelin tire (Michelin Preceda). As an FYI, the Bridgestone's couldn't be used for N. American 17's because they are summer only (and while Mazda can get away with a summer-only tire for say an RX-8, it wouldn't work for a Mazda3).