Hmmmmm.
The problem is that even with everything listed so far, nothing prevents that first person from getting scammed.
1. feedback: I've used the ebay system.... for the most part all it does is warn saavy people away from potential scammers, but if you ignore it, or something unfortunate happens, well.. you still need to take feedback with a grain of salt.
2. post count: means nothing. just that the person has posted a bunch of times. doesn't make more secure.
3. tracking numbers: are good as a tool to see where their package is.. but in the case of a money order that gets cashed and no tracking # appears. you are SOL.
4. Buyers guide post: is a great idea. Only downfall with this is that people ACTUALLY HAVE TO READ AND UNDERSTAND IT. (and matters not if they don't pay attention.
So are we trying to prevent scammers or repeat scammers?)
The only really effective way to stop scamming is either a neutral party receive both items, verify the item and cash, and then forward to respective parties. That way, no product or money exchanges till both have been confirmed. Great idea, but nowhere near practical.
Good security takes time, so what can you do to prevent/minimise potential scammers?
1. Could we have some sort of picture ID verification? Say, a driver's license that has to match the name and address of the person money is being sent to (along with photo of item) I have a feeling that people who scam are less likely to do so if their address is known and a place is established where a police report can be filed. Not to mention having their face plastered over the interporn....er web. If a neutral party were to have or hold onto info then people not displaying a "verified" sig, or some sort of identification should have their posts deleted or moved to locked unviewable thread until they are verified.
2. Could we have a sort of deposit system, where a seller has to place a deposit to a neutral party. True people could work in teams i guess.... but this is still quite troublesome for someone with 1 post who just wants to make a quick buck. (again not all that practical)
The problem is that even with everything listed so far, nothing prevents that first person from getting scammed.
1. feedback: I've used the ebay system.... for the most part all it does is warn saavy people away from potential scammers, but if you ignore it, or something unfortunate happens, well.. you still need to take feedback with a grain of salt.
2. post count: means nothing. just that the person has posted a bunch of times. doesn't make more secure.
3. tracking numbers: are good as a tool to see where their package is.. but in the case of a money order that gets cashed and no tracking # appears. you are SOL.
4. Buyers guide post: is a great idea. Only downfall with this is that people ACTUALLY HAVE TO READ AND UNDERSTAND IT. (and matters not if they don't pay attention.
So are we trying to prevent scammers or repeat scammers?)
The only really effective way to stop scamming is either a neutral party receive both items, verify the item and cash, and then forward to respective parties. That way, no product or money exchanges till both have been confirmed. Great idea, but nowhere near practical.
Good security takes time, so what can you do to prevent/minimise potential scammers?
1. Could we have some sort of picture ID verification? Say, a driver's license that has to match the name and address of the person money is being sent to (along with photo of item) I have a feeling that people who scam are less likely to do so if their address is known and a place is established where a police report can be filed. Not to mention having their face plastered over the interporn....er web. If a neutral party were to have or hold onto info then people not displaying a "verified" sig, or some sort of identification should have their posts deleted or moved to locked unviewable thread until they are verified.
2. Could we have a sort of deposit system, where a seller has to place a deposit to a neutral party. True people could work in teams i guess.... but this is still quite troublesome for someone with 1 post who just wants to make a quick buck. (again not all that practical)
Last edited: