I'd get a short lense before a long one... without my 18-55 my 50mm would cripple the crap out of me... and even with the 18-55 my buddy couldn't take good shots of the progress on his house.
correct me if I'm wrong but the 70-300 is a cheapo lens... isn't the 75-300 MUCH better? or have I got this backwards?
the 70-300 replaced the 75-300. It's midrange. Costs about 600-700 bux new. Comes with IS and has a quieter focusing motor and faster than the 75-300.
Hey Sleeper, I added you on Flickr if you don't mind.
I guess I'll never be a true photo nut, because theres just no way in hell I can justify spending the kind of money you guys talk about on lenses. I'll pick up a reasonably priced tele at some point, and I think I'd like another prime.. but no way will my total investment in photo s*** exceed $1500.. TOTAL.
i haz backwrads.. i phale.
For sure, but it's hard to not buy toys LOL. Another prime that might be good for you is the 85mm 1.8 or a 35mm 1.8. Other than that, you're probably looking at a huge price jump if you do go to faster primes.
135mm L
200mm L
85mm L
28 or 24mm I think
HUGE price jumps.
Definitely not man. Your exposure is good, white balance is good and focus is good. That's really the hardest part. I like the first picture you took most (engine cover). Keep at it, take inspiration from other's styles and you'll be good to go.
Look forward to seeing what you come up with!
so it's go time with the new camera... I'm trying to decide between a 50d and a 1d mkII... what do you guys think? right now I'm siding with the 50d...