2005 Ford Mustang V-6

mikeyb

Member
Contributor
:
01 BMW 325xi Touring
2005 Ford Mustang V-6

s.gif



By Erik B. Johnson
Photography: Mike Dushane


<!--begin image--><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 align=right border=0><TBODY><TR><TD>
s.gif
</TD></TR><TR><TD align=right>
0502_ford_mustang_01.jpg
</TD><TD>
s.gif
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><!--end image-->Since time immemorial-well, since being introduced halfway through the 1964 model year-the automatic Mustang has comprised the largest chunk of sales, so the all-new 2005 V-6 would undoubtedly have sold well had Ford done nothing more than alter the styling. But with major improvements in every area, all those red-blooded Americans who sign on the dotted line will be getting a lot more car for the money.


The V-6 Mustang starts just shy of twenty grand, while the example we drove can be had for a value-packed $22,890. Nudging the price upwards were the autobox ($995), an anti-theft system ($255), wheel locks ($50), side air bags ($370), ABS ($775), and the Premium package ($450) consisting of 16-inch wheels with chrome spinners, an MP3 audio system with six-disc CD changer, leather upholstery, and a power driver's seat. Add all of that to the inherent goodness of the all-new platform and you've got yourself one hell of a car.


<!--begin image--><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 align=right border=0><TBODY><TR><TD>
s.gif
</TD></TR><TR><TD align=right>
0502_ford_mustang_02.jpg
</TD><TD>
s.gif
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><!--end image-->While the 4.0-liter, 202-hp V-6 can't compare to the delicious 4.6-liter, 300-hp V-8 from the Mustang GT, the pick-up-and-go will be plenty for most folks, and the sound is as purely American as can be had from six cylinders. (We can't help but feel that those with a lust for more thrust would likely look at the GT first, anyway.)


The five-speed automatic is (mostly) fabulous. During upshifts, power delivery is baby-skin smooth and gear-selection unobtrusive and confident. Punch the throttle, however, and the car takes a confused pause before slipping into a lower gear. There's no confusion, though, in the steering; it's direct, linear, and puts the car exactly where you want it with minimal input. The ride is decent, too. One niggle: maneuvering through traffic, the Mustang felt every bit as big as advertised, a perception not helped by the large steering wheel and high hood. Piloting the 187-plus-inch car into tiny openings was adrenalizing, to say the least.


Another pulse-raising experience is finding yourself in a bumpy corner. The solid rear axle makes this car extremely lively, a problem that also afflicts the GT. Hit a bump, and the rear-end can get very light and squirrely, a condition that only gets worse in the wet.


<!--begin image--><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 align=right border=0><TBODY><TR><TD>
s.gif
</TD></TR><TR><TD align=right>
0502_ford_mustang_03.jpg
</TD><TD>
s.gif
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><!--end image-->But who cares as long as you look cool, right? We were stopped numerous times to chat about this car, including by a cop, who asked not for our license and registration, but instead wanted to know "how we got to be so lucky." There's been some grumbling that the styling is too derivative and too retro, but we say it's spot on.


So, the car looks great and drives sweetly enough. Inside, you can immediately spot where costs were trimmed-the glovebox cover, chintzy Jeep-boombox-esque speakers, and grained dash and door plastics look and feel every bit as inexpensive as they surely are. The rear seats were comfortable, but only those suffering from a height deficiency (think 5'3" and shorter) will have any headroom. The steering wheel felt a little too big in diameter and the seats lacked thigh support. We would be remiss, however, if we didn't say how cool MyColor is. Even though the novelty wore off fairly quickly, altering the instrument panel lighting color never failed to impress. All buttons and knobs were well-placed and much more solid than most GM products.


All minor complaints (and praises) aside, anyone would be hard-pressed to find a better combination of performance, price, and style than the Mustang. The only competitors in the sub-$20,000 price range are small, import sports cars like the Hyundai Tiburon, Acura RSX, Toyota Celica, and Mitsubishi Eclipse. While some of those rides are mighty fine (RSX), their smallish dimensions and four-cylinder engines put them in a different niche.


<!--begin image--><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 align=right border=0><TBODY><TR><TD>
s.gif
</TD></TR><TR><TD align=right>
0502_ford_mustang_04.jpg
</TD><TD>
s.gif
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><!--end image-->In the past, the V-6 Mustang has been the sort of car you would likely find parked in close proximity to a Tupperware party or bake sale. The latest iteration, however, makes a strong case for the enthusiast on a budget, and some may even prefer its better-balanced chassis over the extra grunt of the GT.
<!--startclickprintexclude-->



http://www.automobilemag.com
 
98 hp diff!

Nothing good headwork and exhaust won't help. Shoot if somone get creative headwork Twin T2 at 7psi and ecu reflash would make well over 325hp with less weight and better handling plus the opertunity to rub a V6 in somones face.
 
I dunno, I think a nice amount of werk to the engine, plus a nice SC would also do pretty well on there.
 
I haven't seen officials numbers on the V6 '05 stang yet but I'd be willing to bet they're right up there with the MSP for the same price.

The V6 stang is never meant to be a big performer....it's meant to be a little sporty car for people who have a girl that will be driving one. I know I've owned 8 and every girl I ever dated swore instant sex to me if I let them behind the wheel. Then my wife has owned 4....93 Cobra, 92 Twin turbo GT and a 98 Cobra and a 99 V6. While the V8's appeal to the guys the girls just care if it LOOKS like a V8.
 
Glowmunkey said:
V6 stangs = useless. Let's face it, Stangs without V8s are just cheesy cars without any power... at least the GTs have a real motor.


thats about as crazy a someone saying a WRX is cheesy because it doesn't have the 2.5 that the STI has.
 
GHOSTWHISPER said:
Ford licks dockey dick, there cars are pieces of s***

The last time my mom came up from Florida she rented a Mustang, I took it out and flogged the crap out of it, man what a piece of s*** that car was.

It only had 5k miles on it and it creaked and s*** shook and one of the headlights was out, the gaps in the boddy panels were off and the inside was so cheap looking it made me giggle.

FORD = cheap built crap.

What ruined FORD? Unions.
 
www.ky-kia.com said:
thats about as crazy a someone saying a WRX is cheesy because it doesn't have the 2.5 that the STI has.
WRX is a nicer car than a Stang. Mustangs are about a decent motor and reasonably strong drivetrain, the rest is just mediocre. So without the V8 you have a car with mediocre handling, reliability to rival old Yugos and all the acceleration to get ditched by every ricer that is out on the street with something faster than a 1989 Civic with two flat tires.
 
Last edited:
Slider said:
The last time my mom came up from Florida she rented a Mustang, I took it out and flogged the crap out of it, man what a piece of s*** that car was.

It only had 5k miles on it and it creaked and s*** shook and one of the headlights was out, the gaps in the boddy panels were off and the inside was so cheap looking it made me giggle.
Not to defend Ford's build quality, but you also have to keep in mind the type of driving that a rental car gets, look at how you drove it. That said, my Mustang does have creaks and rattles that my ten year old Japanese cars never developed...
 
Back