Search results

I totally agree with you bud. Do you really need all that carbon fiber stuff?? Seriously, mirror covers? Door sills? Oh please...a cf hood is all you should do. All the others are just bad investments. And somebody needs to make the clear bumper lens and stop making all the other useless stuff.

It looks awesome. It's the second best looking true wagon so far. (Ours doesn't count because it's really not big enough to be considered a true wagon. I'm sorry, but the A4 Avant still looks much better.

Mine is dark all around, top of the line, lifetime warranty w/free replacement for any reason whatsoever, for only $110. I've had it for over 6 months and it still looks the same as the day I first did it. I live in Southern California, which usually means prices are high for everything...

a neon will always be a neon. as fast as it is, I wouldn't be caught dead in it. would you be caught dead in a 10 second Kia Rio?

Very good question to the "intake is intake" assumption. Anyone educated in this area enough to take this?

Thanks guys. That just confirms my decision.

It is legal because the bulb is at least amber. You can have clear lens but the bulb needs to be amber. Take the BMW 3-Series Coupes for example. Included in the Sport Package are Clear front corner lamps. However, there are amber bulbs in the lamps. Auto Manufacterers and Retailers are not...

When did I say the light on the bumper blinked? When did I say the "accessory" light doesn't blink? Re-read my post and think about what you just said. Let me make it easier for you. AMBER BUMBER LIGHT = DOES NOT BLINK = LEGAL REASONS. And for the other one: SIDE MARKER LIGHT = DOES BLINK =...

sportier?!?!

Thanks for the response guys, but I'm still in between. No one has swayed me in either direction yet. I'm leaning towards AEM just cuz it's cheaper, but wonder if it'll lack in extra power just because it's a short ram.

I notice that it's a different front bumper too so he probably didn't have trouble putting that universal lens on. I like it though and I totally dig the wheels.

Yup, and the only thing that you should get to protect the front is a deflector because it does not cover anything up.

I'm glad you (Cheese) see my point. Why protect something by covering it up and never even seeing it? Protect the paint but covering up the paint and not even seeing the paint is just self defeating. Kinda like a pocket protector, or a leather cell phone case. Unless it improves the look but...

Just get the fibreglass one, paint-match the silver, and get wider rims, it'll look decent. But I'd have to see it colormatched before I can really say.

Regarding the P5 w/ a sunroof that doesn't come with the roof racks, it's just a coincidence or the dealer did that on purpose. But like they said above, it's a stand-alone accessory with the 2003.5 along with the subwoofer, eventhough most salesmen don't even know that themselves.

That was another dumb statement. The Amber lens on the corner is basically there for legal reasons like Sir Nuke said. According to the US law, there has to be an Amber colored light in the front corner of the car, visible from the side. The side markers are for safety reasons. Let's say I'm...

Just ditch the whole thing. It's self defeating.

It's probably the driver. Plus the RSX looks better anyway. I wouldn't be caught dead in an SE-R no matter how fast it is. Just like I wouldn't be caught dead in a Dodge Neon SRT, even if it does an acclaimed 0-60 in sub-6 seconds.

2.0 Liter producing 200 horspower, naturally-aspirated? I'll take the RSX Type-S any day. The only 4 naturally aspirated cars producing at least 100 HP per liter are the Acura RSX Type-S, BMW M3, Ferrari 575M (I think, but one of the Ferrari's), and the most with 120 HP per liter, the Honda...

I know many of you have one of the two. The AEM is short ram while the Injen Cai is not and the AEM is usually $30-$50 cheaper too. Which do you prefer or have?