Search results

The Stelvio I drove didn't really do a whole lot the CX5 didn't, and it felt laggier and less crisp in general. I'm sure it pushes less under neutral corner entry, but...okay... The CX5 is large enough by far. The Edge, my ex gf had one, very poor quality vehicle. As noted, the ST isn't any...

Reliability with those as well as the tuned CX5 is an issue, but I drive a bit less now since I changed roles at work.

I'm actually going back. The AWD in the GTR is better, and the chassis is more rigid. -OTHERWISE- The Prime was better.

I've already got over 10K on my Prime. I had 80K on my 2019 GT Reserve when I traded it. Had 106K on my 2016 CX5 that I bought with 28K midway through the 2015 year.

I've also driven 170K miles since 2016, lol!

This is my neighborhood:

Im just impressed that the engine held up with an absolute nightmare concoction lubricating it.

This is not cause to distrust turbos. Just be leery of first production years of anything. Mirror motors come to mind...

This is not s turbo issue. People point to a turbo as an issue. I have yet to see a failure from one on the 2.5T mazda. What you referenced are failures of other components, also not caused by a turbo, but rather bad assembly or design of that specific item.

Has anyone ever heard of a mazda 2.5 turbo failure when run in oem configuration? Its been out for 6+ years...

So where does it...live?

Dont you just plug the tuner in to OBD, remap, and unplug? Whats all this talk of maf connectors?

This is true. I have not, yet.

I figured if I didn't like it, it made me $12k, so whatever, eh? It was a decision based on finances as well as hopes Id like it.

This reads like the CX90 and CX70 will be very similarly dimensionally, which is a turn off to me. It may well not be any better performing than the CX5 (think RDX vs. MDX) https://www.kbb.com/mazda/cx-90/ This will not be lighter than the CX9, I am quite suspicious, and that means overcoming...

I just crossed 10K miles in my Rav4 Prime. I put 235/55/19 105H rated CC2's on it when new. The tires have been exceptional in every way. -Sound: They are quiet. On everything. No pavement types made this tire sound loud or annoying in any way. It is the most uniformly quiet tire I've driven...

Yes, they are trash. AT 17K miles mine were at 4.5/32. Pure trash. My replacement tires lasted about 50K miles for reference---It wasn't ME. Nor did the car even need or get a realignment with the install!

What do you find questionable?

MDX is wasted space for my use. RDX has a fair bit of complaint online, and is slower to boot. XT5 just gets terrible reviews from everyone. R4P I have now is basically a Lexus 450h+ top trim, drivetrain wise already. Stelvio I test drove was very forgettable, and dealer is 200mi away. Macan...