Recent content by Siccnes

Didn't really want to respond to anything you had to say..but that asian girl in your sig is cute..that's all..

Yeah, that's what i'm beginning to see is that it is probably just less cost effective which would clearly indicate why it's not as prevelant.

well, if we're talking about an unstoppable wave, it would either bounce back or reverberate throughout the immoveable object until it was dissapated, but since it's unstoppable, it would probably just pass through it.

Thanks..so in theory, turbos would make a smaller injen more gas friendly and produce the same amount of power...and as far as the v v. i debate, very insightful. ha..yeah..dual cams may be good and all, but I member I was going to change out my cams for something more race on my last car, then...

k, so they are out there, one thinks they're worthwhile, while another thinks it's insufficient as is. Any scientific proof on either side? I guess the balancer shaft is one for the insufficient side. I guess I was just more interested in any momentum advantages to either way? Is either more...

ha..yeah..I wiki'd it soon after the question..

ha..i think that was another one of those questions...but there is no light given off by a black hole..because it's so dense it sucks that in too. it was positively charged helium ions...protons...

or was it electrons? maybe it was electrons..

what if the speeding black hole passed through the ginormous wall like protons through gold foil?

I would have to say I'd place my bets on the speeding black hole..versus ginormous wall.

but then again, we used to think atoms were the end all...but then we gave them speed..and they turned into quarks...*shrugs*

I'll have to ponder that one a little longer..but..initally..an objects force is correlated to it's mass and velocity..velocity is limited..and I would assume it's mass would be limited too because the larger something becomes, the greater it's gravity becomes..and this force would cause it to...

I would have to say your mind is processing the past. It takes a little while for your eyes to relay what they see to your mind and then for your mind to process it. Your eyes can only see what's in front of it, not what's past, but on the same note..it would take a while for those images to...

I'm not saying there wasn't, I guess the better question is why isn't it more prevelant?

I'm guessin it's not space efficient, but just wonderin. Wouldn't turbo kits on smaller engines make for more fuel efficient cars with the same amount of horse power?