Post The Best Pictures of Your Mazda

[thejeans]

there doesnt have to be a significant distance...

 

[Goliat6288]

there doesnt have to be a significant distance...

ok kol. thanks bro

 

[ajkulish]

you want a dslr and set the f stop as low as possible and focus on the subject. the rest will appear out of focus

 

[Goliat6288]

i haz a 20D... i iz photographer lol... thanks aj.. now to find out how the hell to adjust the fstop on that thing

 

[ajkulish]

look at the top to change mode, there will be an S for shutter speed, M for manual, and A for aperture. go to the Aperture and use the adjustment wheel or whatever you have to do to get to change it down to 3.2 or 2.8. you might only be able to go to 4.5 though

 

[not yellow]

yes, it's the fstop(also called aperture) not the focus that creates the effect. low aperture setting = low depth of field. and the closer you are to the subject the more exaggerated the effect becomes.

 

[ajkulish]

yep. btw thats a great shot

 

[Goliat6288]

look at the top to change mode, there will be an S for shutter speed, M for manual, and A for aperture. go to the Aperture and use the adjustment wheel or whatever you have to do to get to change it down to 3.2 or 2.8. you might only be able to go to 4.5 though

thank you sir... i was wondering what S and A were for

yes, it's the fstop(also called aperture) not the focus that creates the effect. low aperture setting = low depth of field. and the closer you are to the subject the more exaggerated the effect becomes.

thank you very much also sir

yep. btw thats a great shot

and i agree lol

 

[thejeans]

**edit
i went back and looked at a few things and you guys are right, i had a moment of stupidity haha

 

[tigermack]

 

[FlyinHawaiian]

mmmm narrow...

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/finktel_jr/4559820738/" title="Teaser Pic2 by Finktel Jr Productions, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3030/4559820738_9f23454032_z.jpg" width="640" height="427" alt="Teaser Pic2" /></a>

 

[Chefsp0t]

 

[FlyinHawaiian]

Narrow DOF & 10mm of wide goodness:

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/finktel_jr/4648118843/" title="Flushhhh by Finktel Jr Productions, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4018/4648118843_3fb01b2e78_z.jpg" width="640" height="427" alt="Flushhhh" /></a>

 

[Wagonbacker9]

chef with the wicked stance.... thats perfect in my book.

 

[tigermack]

RP03. Sexy.

 

[Chefsp0t]

Thanks guys! I love these wheels. I was worried they would look too big but they just look aggressive as hell. I am pretty happy with the stance. Here's another from today. I couldn't drive it down my driveway without rolled fenders or I would have taken some better shots.

 

[Wagonbacker9]

Heres a reverse to the traditional depth of field shot...

 

[Goliat6288]

Thanks guys! I love these wheels. I was worried they would look too big but they just look aggressive as hell. I am pretty happy with the stance. Here's another from today. I couldn't drive it down my driveway without rolled fenders or I would have taken some better shots.

sexy bro

 

[TheBeachBumm]

I'm from Houston graduated from Westfield H.S. which is in the area that you say you are from. I must be blind because I never see anything like what you have posted here, and I'm glad because I would gouge my eye's out! Would you mind telling me your first or last name?

I agree, I'm from Houston too & I haven't seen the ricer scene here in a loooong time. Although the ones I do still see aren't near as well kept as yours. I give you props for that. Most of them have falling off APC parts from Pepboys.


And DAMN Chef, that setup is sexy as hell! Are you going to keep the rims that color?

 

[altspace]

how do you make the background look out of focus compared to your 8?

As everyone already stated...would also point out it depends on the lens you have. I was using a Canon 70-300mm at f5 and at 135mm.