Boo!! Looks are subjective. But yeah... Those bmws sucked balls
So true and the Pontiac Aztek was proof of that. There are people who think those things look good.
Last edited:
Boo!! Looks are subjective. But yeah... Those bmws sucked balls
That's either the same power or slightly more than the current European MPS. It's a bit lower than the NA model because of emissions restrictions.
The 2010 Mazdaspeed3 we get in NA is supposed to have 268, which is a small bump.
You guys all expect the car to evolve significantly for some reason. Why would they do that? The car is still at the top of its segment, and significant dynamics/power train/drive train/suspension changes require a lot of time and money to R&D and to get them right - money that no one in the world has right now. The out-going Mazda3 was a winner, a class leader that faced very little competition, and they opted (wisely, I think) to leave it relatively unchanged but give it a bit of a facelift. It's hard to follow up a great car with a ground-up rebuild that is just as good or better, and it's also risky for companies to try this. That's not what this is. The core of the car remains the same. Same platform, same suspension and brakes more or less, same drivetrains more or less.
If you were expecting more, you need to revisit your expectations and understandings of car manufacturing.
lol:
|
|
v
![]()
I kinda like it... got a bit of a mean look to it.... but it is kinda ugly. Kinda like an STI...ugly. My biggest regret about it is the smile, and some of the lines remind me of a 02 mercury cougar or a scion or something (can't quite put my finger on it.) But over all I like it. I like the rear of the car A lot.
I would have to dispute this. I studied aerospace engineering in school (have a degree in it), and spent some time working with wind/water tunnels.
Look at the profile (side view) of the current and 2010 MS3. The curve over the front hood, from about 6 inches below the emblem to the mouth of the scoop can be approximated as 1/4 of a circle or sphere. In fact it is a little less than 1/4. You can use the model of airflow over a sphere or cylinder as an approximation for airflow over the hood.
Spheres/cylinders are horribly un aerodynamic. Not because the face pushing through the air is blunt, but because as the air moves around the sphere and curves around the back of it, you get bad separation effects, causing turbulent flow and hence drag. This separation occurs at a point before the top/bottom of the sphere (again if your looking at a side view/cross section of the sphere).
Where the MS3 differs from the aerodynamic profile of a sphere is in the fact that the hood rises as the air flows from the front edge towards the windshield. This keeps air pressure levels higher on the hood and helps reduce separation effects. The scoop is also placed far enough forward, and sticks up enough to not be effected by separation effects.
Further backing my claim is the salt lines on the hood of my car. I get white streaks from leading edge of the hood almost all the way up to the windshield. They indicate the way the air flows over the front of the car (as it does it pushes water and salt sprayed from the road up the hood). If it did indeed flow as you suggested these lines would cease to be straight after the point of airflow separation.
For an effect like what you talk about, you would need a condition creating a shock wave off the hood of the car. For that you you need near sonic/supersonic (Mach 1 ish) velocities. From there you start dealing with compressible flow issues etc etc etc. Sadly our little Mazdas just can't go that fast.
-Pete
even though delaware doesn't require front license plates, i might be willing to make an exception to help cover up some of that happy face
It's too bad the grille couldn't be hooked up somehow to your mood. Days when you're feelin chipper... crazy smile face. Pissed and ready to fight? scream mask just mindin your own business... nuetral. I'm tellin you... animatronic grilles... hell yeah.
can you say MATRIXSPEED! ugliest shet ever
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()