Pants McGregor said:Why is it OK to see people getting killed on TV but not a nipple ? Thats a messed up way of thinking.
laracroft said:yeah, what's this country coming to? Let's see some pictures of d**ks on here. How about a guy with his tight ass spead eagle on a P5 with nothing but a jock strap.
laracroft said:I came on this site to learn about my car and go to meets, not learn anatomy 101.
laracroft said:You like what the other countries are doing... there is always an airplane and ticket with your name on it. Have fun.
if you're talking about abortion, that's a discussion for another dayCeej said:What do you expect with a leadership in the White House that covers up art because it is "dirty"?
The Republican Party, by the way of courts and new laws are trying to tell women what they can and can't do with their bodies, and what is "safe" for all of us to see on television.
Join me in voteing for whoever runs against Bush, thank you.
laracroft said:Hey, I see my nipples everyday, but you dont see ME flashing them on this forum for immature entertainment do YOU? And as long as you dont have a problem with showing c**ks and jocks, let me find a picture to put as my avatar and lemme see how many guys tell me "wow, thats hot.., nice pic!" Duhhh... and dont bring up maturity levels on here. So far this thread just shows how low yours can go. But that was to be expected as soon as I saw who started this thread. Carry on in your fight to see something you must not see everyday...
No, the real problem is you are again ignoring context. As I have said before, look at the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel. Boobs EVERYWHERE! But its not at all in a sexual context so its fine. Same thing with the MTV undercover on the brest agmentation or Life time showing child birth.pingdum said:You're missing the whole point. The point is that nipples arn't necessarily a big deal one way or the other. I don't care if people show their asses or whatever. It's the people who get all offended and hyper about these things that draw all the attention and make people (especially kids) think that something big deal is going on. Personally I do think I have the mature adult attitude about this subject in that I can handle seeing a naked body part without going all off. Unlike the Attorney General who can't even look at a statue of Justice without getting all freaked out.
nate0123 said:So where do you draw the line? Maybe an artistic nipple is ok, but what about when it gets provocative, or maybe someone is licking the nipple? And maybe they show coitus in a beautiful, "natural" way, should that be okay too? Maybe those involved are under 18? Where do you stop?
And I don't for a second buy the notion that you'd be okay with penis pictures posted around the site
I didn't see the actual avatar, and I didn't know it was Janet's breast... and yea I agree1st MP3 in NH said:There was nothing artistic about Janet flashing a nipple to mimic a sexual act to use her body as a marketing ploy to sell albums. Michangelos David is Art. A 40 year old, dried up, no talent skank is not art not is her mutilated tit.
nate0123 said:I didn't see the actual avatar, and I didn't know it was Janet's breast... and yea I agree