One thing that has always puzzled me is how similar Mazda makes the 3 different models (Sport, Touring and Grand Touring)
Disclaimer: I bought a Mazda5 Touring model this past summer. But in reality one of the biggest reason why I go the Touring model is because we could not find the right color in Sport within 200 miles of us. I probably would have been perfectly happy with the Sport... and probably less poor.
My only regret I feel in my purchase is that I had to spend and extra $2000 for the Touring model and all I got was a sunroof and foglights (which I rarely use) and a 6-disc CD player (which is basically obsolete with my MP3 player).
In the GT you get leather and a a few items like moisture sensor wipers, and garage door opener... but is it worth the $4-5K premium? I would think that at the very least the GT would have a better engine or suspension but it's exactly the same as the Sport.
Does anyone else feel the same way? Or am I missing something?
Disclaimer: I bought a Mazda5 Touring model this past summer. But in reality one of the biggest reason why I go the Touring model is because we could not find the right color in Sport within 200 miles of us. I probably would have been perfectly happy with the Sport... and probably less poor.

My only regret I feel in my purchase is that I had to spend and extra $2000 for the Touring model and all I got was a sunroof and foglights (which I rarely use) and a 6-disc CD player (which is basically obsolete with my MP3 player).
In the GT you get leather and a a few items like moisture sensor wipers, and garage door opener... but is it worth the $4-5K premium? I would think that at the very least the GT would have a better engine or suspension but it's exactly the same as the Sport.
Does anyone else feel the same way? Or am I missing something?