how fast?

[racer x 3]

here...

2004 3s 2.3 sedan open road #'s (stop watches and walkie talkies used over a course of three runs then averaged) BUT STILL UNNOFFICIAL... and i know the focus is the 2.0 but just tryin..

1/4 mile- undetermined but in the neighborhood of 15.4
0-60- 7.7 sec
0-100-14 sec even
top speed (then limiter kicks in): 121

temp:74 F
alt: roughly 2000 ft above sea level

(deadhorse sorry.... ha

 

[FLAMEBOY]

its the driver thats y ... you cant drive sorry!!!!!

(boom07)

well, its possible, if the 1/4 mile track is DOWN SLOPE... (hah)

 

[mz304]

(boom07)

well, its possible, if the 1/4 mile track is DOWN SLOPE... (hah)

that to but i know the track is not down slop.. and the 2.0 is lighter then the 2.3

 

[racer x 3]

that to but i know the track is not down slop.. and the 2.0 is lighter then the 2.3

just my two cents.... i dinno know man, thats.....a tough sell...
but if im giving you the benefit of the doubt,........ nice run....?

 

[mp5jeff]

2.0 ran 15.6 stock? haha ok, timeslip? i ran a 16.0 in the 2.3 stock, so i tied car and driver, and i was getting the worst 60' ever, think my best was 2.3x, ps what was your trap speed mz304 since you aren't going to post a timeslip im sure....

 

[BC3I]

that to but i know the track is not down slop.. and the 2.0 is lighter then the 2.3

by like a 100lbs! please need a better excuse than that or prove it by showing a slip! (jerkit)

Curb weight (lbs)
2.0L i MT 2,696 (PZEV = 2,718) 2.0L i AT 2,738 (PZEV = 2,760)
2.3L 4dr s & SP23 MT 2,762 5dr 2,826
2.3L 4dr s & SP23 AT 2,807 5dr 2,857

 

[Puckpimp71]

100lbs lighter and only a 12hp difference, 10hp for '06. I think the 2.3 has nicer power band, though.

 

[ZoomVT]

GI? is that you?

 

[racer x 3]

a buddy of mine hit the track this week end and ran a 1/4 mile in his 5speed 05 sedan 2.0l currently stock......

and he's damn good...usually a week-end warrior moving down as hes getting older from an impreza 22b (sold for $60,000(!?)... anyway...

BEST TIME: 16.x (.7or .8?)......... not 15.6...

 

[ZoomVT]

blah

 

[hyck]

I have a 2l and I went to the track last week. It was my first time on the track so I don't think I did that good, but my best time was 16.5, I will try to scan my timeslip and I'll post

 

[hyck]

forgot to mansion The only mod is a intake, it's a 5speed, and I striped it prety good, I left only the driver's seat

 

[smp3000]

You live in a mansion?

 

[BC3I]

forgot to mansion The only mod is a intake, it's a 5speed, and I striped it prety good, I left only the driver's seat

wow...geeze that must have been fun

 

[hyck]

ups sorry .... forgot to mention The only mod is a intake, it's a 5speed, and I striped it prety good, I left only the driver's seat

 

[BC3I]

im gonna try to go to LACR and race on friday to see what i get...if i do go i will post the runs

 

[jbass]

With the 2 liters I had:

15.829 with: flywheel, exhaust, intake, SSK, jack and spare taken out and heavy 17's

14.16: same thing than the things listed on my first run + 55hp nitrous

next year I'll go with crazy light 15 inches rim to see what I can do...

 

[BC3I]

With the 2 liters I had:

15.829 with: flywheel, exhaust, intake, SSK, jack and spare taken out and heavy 17's

14.16: same thing than the things listed on my first run + 55hp nitrous

next year I'll go with crazy light 15 inches rim to see what I can do...

nice...what is SSK?

 

[nautical2086]

I dont really believe the 2.0 is quicker than the 2.3, 2.3 is deff quicker.

 

[BC3I]

we're not sayin that...this is where us 2.0L owners get to brag about our s***...well sort of....the only thing i must add is this, Juan from Hiboost noted that the 2.0L responded much better to the Turbo than the 2.3L so maybe the 2.0L is more "mod friendly"