Hi,
I've been a Honda man for my whole life, but sold the Honda Element to get a third row seat vehicle to be able to carry the kids more easily. I bought a used 2006 Mazda5 from a sh*tbag who lied and told me it was well taken care of, and its been terrible. Worst tire wear i have ever seen, weird vibrations while cruising (which i have read is a common issue), and sings like a siren going down the road (loud as hell). And he had neglected the maintenance (like 100k mi on the original ATF!)
Anyway, now I have a chance to buy a 2008 Mazda5 for $10k, with only 50k mi on it. It seems to be in much better shape, but i noticed a vibration at 55-60mph with this one too (seemed to be coming from the front right). Tires seemed ok, not super worn on the inside edge like the 06, and not scalloped. Also rode much quieter than the 2006. Now, with all the known issues and poor quality of this car, why would i buy it vs a few years older Toyota highlander? Looking at Consumer Reports, the highlander gets excellent marks for all the reliability categories, but the 5 still get below average on "fuel system" and "squeaks and rattles", and way below average for "suspension" and "brakes", which leads me to believe that the rear camber issues and crappy shocks were never fixed.
Aside from the 4 mpg over the highlander, why would i want the mazda5?
Jive
I've been a Honda man for my whole life, but sold the Honda Element to get a third row seat vehicle to be able to carry the kids more easily. I bought a used 2006 Mazda5 from a sh*tbag who lied and told me it was well taken care of, and its been terrible. Worst tire wear i have ever seen, weird vibrations while cruising (which i have read is a common issue), and sings like a siren going down the road (loud as hell). And he had neglected the maintenance (like 100k mi on the original ATF!)
Anyway, now I have a chance to buy a 2008 Mazda5 for $10k, with only 50k mi on it. It seems to be in much better shape, but i noticed a vibration at 55-60mph with this one too (seemed to be coming from the front right). Tires seemed ok, not super worn on the inside edge like the 06, and not scalloped. Also rode much quieter than the 2006. Now, with all the known issues and poor quality of this car, why would i buy it vs a few years older Toyota highlander? Looking at Consumer Reports, the highlander gets excellent marks for all the reliability categories, but the 5 still get below average on "fuel system" and "squeaks and rattles", and way below average for "suspension" and "brakes", which leads me to believe that the rear camber issues and crappy shocks were never fixed.
Aside from the 4 mpg over the highlander, why would i want the mazda5?
Jive