Advanced Race Technology "long tube" cold air intake made for my 2013 CX-5 GT

Mike, stop being such a dick.

Since when is it being a "dick" to be curious about dyno results that were supposed to be available "next week" over six months ago?

A lot of us are curious and I think it was helpful to bump the thread.

You seem overly sensitive.
 
Since when is it being a "dick" to be curious about dyno results that were supposed to be available "next week" over six months ago?

A lot of us are curious and I think it was helpful to bump the thread.

You seem overly sensitive.

Sorry for never updating on this. The project was abandoned because no one had time for it. ART was busy fabricating turbo kits for Skylines and R8s, and I was busy working on my 3-rotor swap in my RX-7.

We did solve some of the issues that people brought up:

#1, there were people who were worried about the foglight placement of the intake filter and the possibility of sucking up water. We solved this by installing an inline "bypass" filter at the top of the piping (same height as stock airbox). This means the system has two filters, a primary one at the end, and a secondary one in the stock location. If the bottom airfilter is ever submerged, the suction from the motor pulls air from the "bypass" filter allowing air to enter the motor, instead of water. Even though it wasn't a concern of mine, we decided to come up with this solution in case ART ends up producing more of these.

#2, we came up with a billet MAF mount that installs in a narrower diameter section of pipe, which ensures the calibration of the sensor is not affected. We found that the size of the intake piping was not an issue EXCEPT at the point where the MAF sits, because too much air was going around the sensor instead of though it, causing the ECU to think the engine wasn't getting enough air.

The pipe actually makes the car sound a bit deeper and slightly "throaty". I ended up not running it on my own car because the wife didn't like how it made the car "louder" and since the CX-5 is technically for her to daily drive, she wins that argument.

I'll talk to ART and see if they're interested in dyno'ing the final version, but truthfully I think they're too busy and not interested in making any more since they have a lot of other projects on their hands.
 
Last edited:
Sorry for never updating on this. The project was abandoned because no one had time for it. ART was busy fabricating turbo kits for Skylines and R8s, and I was busy working on my 3-rotor swap in my RX-7.

We did solve some of the issues that people brought up:

#1, there were people who were worried about the foglight placement of the intake filter and the possibility of sucking up water. We solved this by installing an inline "bypass" filter at the top of the piping (same height as stock airbox). This means the system has two filters, a primary one at the end, and a secondary one in the stock location. If the bottom airfilter is ever submerged, the suction from the motor pulls air from the "bypass" filter allowing air to enter the motor, instead of water. Even though it wasn't a concern of mine, we decided to come up with this solution in case ART ends up producing more of these.

#2, we came up with a billet MAF mount that installs in a narrower diameter section of pipe, which ensures the calibration of the sensor is not affected. We found that the size of the intake piping was not an issue EXCEPT at the point where the MAF sits, because too much air was going around the sensor instead of though it, causing the ECU to think the engine wasn't getting enough air.

The pipe actually makes the car sound a bit deeper and slightly "throaty". I ended up not running it on my own car because the wife didn't like how it made the car "louder" and since the CX-5 is technically for her to daily drive, she wins that argument.

I'll talk to ART and see if they're interested in dyno'ing the final version, but truthfully I think they're too busy and not interested in making any more since they have a lot of other projects on their hands.
Thanks for the update Theorie!

A lot of us were wondering what happened. Now we know.

It should have been a no-brainer that the MAS could not be mounted in a different size tube than the one it was calibrated with. Even small changes in the placement of such a critical sensor can cause lean or rich spots in the throttle response. But a different sized tube? I would have fired the lead engineer on the spot (and probably any under him that didn't speak up at such an obvious SNAFU).
 

New Threads and Articles

Back